Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Indiana 84, Illinois 71: Hoosiers bury Illini inside and at the line.

Early in the game, it looked at if Illinois big man Meyers Leonard would have the better of IU freshman Cody Zeller. But Zeller fought back, Leonard spent much of the second half in foul trouble and ultimately fouled out, and a potent Hoosier offense overwhelmed the Illini's usually strong defense. IU took the ball inside, both to Zeller and on the drive, and the result was 35-42 free throw shooting, compared to 12-15 for Illinois. The Illini, other than Leonard, were pretty content to take three pointers, taking 21 of their 51 field goal attempts from outside the arc and making 7. Certainly, those threes ended IU runs at various time, and DJ Richardson shot 5-12 from deep. Ultimately, however, much like in the Purdue game, the free throw shooting of Zeller and Victor Oladipo carried the day.

Star-divide

IU's 1.26 points per possession was the Hoosiers' third best total of the season, behind only the games against Iowa and at Penn State. Against one of the Big Ten's best defenses, that's no small accomplishment. Also, the Hoosiers' turnover numbers (a 15-10 advantage) were very good. IU 's 15.5 turnover percentage was the best of the Big Ten season so far and better than in any non-conference game against a major opponent. IU's defensive turnover percentage of 22.5 was the second best of the Big Ten season. Neither team was particularly strong on the offensive boards: IU had a slight advantage, 25 percent to 22 percent. In other words, IU shot 50 percent from the field, was comfortably in the black on turnovers, took three times as many free throws as Illinois, and held its own in every statistical category. That computes to a comfortable win, although as we discussed in the game thread, a comfortable win that felt uncomfortable longer than it should have. That has nothing to do with this team and everything to do with the demeanor of fans after suffering through the previous three seasons and a midseason slump.

Individual performances:
  • Cody Zeller was very good after a tentative start. He finished with a game-high 22 points on 5-8 from the field and 10-12 from the line.
  • Christian Watford rediscovered his offense. He scored 18 on 6-11 from the field, 2-4 from 3, and 4-4 from the line.
  • Victor Oladipo followed up on his career game against Purdue with another very good one: 18 points, 4-8 from the field, and 10-12 from the line, although he did have 5 of IU's ten turnovers.
  • Jordan Hulls shot very well from the three (3-4) and finished with 15 points. Surprisingly, he missed two free throws.
  • Those four starters accounted for 73 of IU's 84 points.
  • Verdell Jones III missed another game with a shoulder injury. I'm sure it was disappointing that he didn't get to play in what might be his final opportunity against his hometown team.
Well, things are starting to come together, aren't they? A week ago, in the wake of the Michigan loss and with the trip to Purdue and this game upcoming, it was easy to construct a scenario in which the season fell apart. That is tougher to do now. IU has now won 4 of 6 since the three game losing streak against Minnesota, OSU, and Nebraska, and has played very well in two heated games over the last week. IU is 19-6, 7-6 in the Big Ten, and with the NC Central game upcoming a 20 win season is virtually guaranteed. According to Pomeroy, IU is favored in all of its remaining games, although the road trip to Minnesota and the home game against MSU strike me as the most dangerous. Most importantly, IU finally seems to have rediscovered the interior, both through Zeller and through penetration by Oladipo. Now, the Hoosiers have only two Big Ten games in the next 14 days. The Hoosiers have the weekend off before playing Northwestern on Wednesday and at Iowa a week from Sunday. In all likelihood, IU can clinch an NCAA Tournament bid by winning their next three games, no matter what happens in Gopherland or in the home games against MSU and Purdue. Over at Peegs.com, before the season, thousands of readers participated in a poll to predict IU's win total, and 18 was the overwhelming favorite. Now, 18 is in the rear view mirror, with hopefully more good things to come.

Oh, and while it was IU 84, Illinois 71 on the scoreboard, it's now IU 84, Illinois 83 in the all-time series. Whew.


Comment 47 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hey do you have the link to that Peegs poll?

I was trying to find it the other day, but Rivals’ search engine is essentially broken.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 7:57 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t, and I don’t even know if the archives go back that far, and it may have been on the premium board. But it basically was a steep bell curve peaking at 18 with 17 and 19 well-represented as well.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 10, 2012 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

right

I remember the poll but I can’t seem to find it. I wanted to take a look at the numbers for comparisons sake between pre-season expectations and the proceeding out-performance of said expectations.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 8:37 AM EST up reply actions  

my thoughts

I really would love Myers Leonard on this team. The dude is a meast with near unlimited potential. Inevitably we’re going to compare him to Zeller, so I will say that I like that he is more aggressive than Zeller. Although Zeller eventually started to fight back, the opening aggression on the part of Leonard’s part was what set the pace to start the game. I really hope he goes pro this season (he shouldn’t) because another year against him could be brutal. That being said, he does lack the basketball IQ that Zeller possesses. That aggression bit him in the ass, when he came back in from taking that shot from Zeller. You saw the look on his face and knew he was going to do something stupid. That is his biggest flaw by far.

Zeller really responded and even though he didn’t wear his emotions out there you could tell by his body language he was up to the physical challenge. The kid was really banging down low and battling it out with the aggressor. Now if we can just get Cody to bring that mentality to every game without having to be instigated into it, he’d be unstoppable. He never got emotional but you could see on his one big dunk that he turned and made brief eye contact with Leonard before heading down the court. That little look said, “bitch, what?!” and I was a fan of it.

Remember how I said we missed VJIII at times in West Lafayette? We didn’t tonight. I loved that starting lineup and Oladipo and Hulls did a great job of beating their men off the dribble before dishing. I’m afraid VJIII may have lost his job to injury as the extra athleticism from Elston and Sheehey was a big boost to our game last night. If Hulls and Oladipo continue the types of games they had last night, there is no way Yogi Ferrell starts next year.

Good lord, I love a good free throw shooting team. IU’s 35 free throws made is the same number Purdue has made in its last 3 basketball games (was going to use Butler as they’re an even worse FT shooting team than Purdue, but they hit 21 in their last contest. Therefore the facts don’t fit the narrative.)

Don’t let people tell you IU got the benefit of the officiating last night. Despite a few wild moments of inconsistency to start the half, it was a pretty well officiated game. I didn’t like how tight it was called on some of the tic-tac fouls but they were called consistently so no real complaints. The fact that Illinois settled mostly for jumpers instead of taking it to the rim accounts for the major difference in FT shooting numbers. Oladipo and Hulls getting the ball into the lane and then to the basket through passing always had their defense a step late. This crew should officiate more games.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 8:13 AM EST reply actions  

Well-said.

I really love how this team has overcome the adversity of previous games and regained its early-season composure. Of course, the schedule easing up helps a lot, but it’s good to see the team clicking at this time of year. I hope they keep it up.

A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.

by LoneStarHoosier on Feb 10, 2012 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

makes you feel confident about the first round or two of the tournament

but a little less confident about rounds 3-4. Hopefully a neutral site will help negate the road woes against high quality opponents. IU fans do travel very well, so there should be a solid presence wherever we wind up.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

The nice thing about this year’s NCAA Tournament is that four of the eight first weekend venues (Louisville, Nashville, Columbus, and Pittsburgh) are within a fairly easy weekend trip from central Indiana. So even if IU doesn’t get a top 4 seed we have even odds of being in a place where we can bring a crowd. Since playing in Indy in the opening rounds in 1993, the closest to home that IU has played on the first weekend has been Buffalo and a couple of visits to DC. Of course, that doesn’t include the awesomeness of the Sweet 16 and Elite 8 games at Rupp Arena in 2002, where IU had an enormous crowd advantage (even the UK fans were rooting for IU over Duke—don’t think that would happen this year).

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 10, 2012 9:11 AM EST up reply actions  

louisville would be amazing.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 10, 2012 9:24 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

The only problem is that Kentucky almost certainly will be there, so tickets would be really tough.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 10, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I remember 2 instances where Leonard got hacked pretty hard and there was no call.

But I also remember one pretty blatant no-call on what should have been a foul on Sheehey. So I agree, it wasn’t too bad. The difference is that on one of the no calls on a Leonard hack he decided to bitch to the officials instead of get back on D which lead to a beautiful Hulls-assisted Zeller dunk. Gotta keep your head in the game, Leonard.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 10, 2012 9:21 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

But, or also,

Leonard should have fouled out with about 18 minutes to go. The early shove heading down the court should have been a foul. Also, if I recall correctly, he was initially called on a charge, that got changed to a blocking foul. Should have been a charge.

by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 10, 2012 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

nah

Elston’s heel was on the line. That was the right call. Didn’t know you could go back and review it (which I think is a little bogus) but they got it right.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

That's actually missing one.

On one of IU’s outside shots, I saw Zeller go flying and Leonard standing in the lane in rebound position. He hip-butted Cody into the pad on the goal. No whistle. I was screaming at the TV.

--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."

--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 10, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

there were no doubt some missed/bad calls in the game

it is impossible to be perfect, but overall it was pretty well done in the context of the officiating job over the entire year by the B1G.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

This

Oladipo and Hulls getting the ball into the lane and then to the basket through passing always had their defense a step late

A million times over. If O can work on his ballhandling skills in the offseason, which are still a bit raw, he can become almost unstoppable out there. At that point, given his athleticism, you also start talking about whether he has an NBA future (IMO, needs to work a lot on his shooting). Also, I love how Hulls has been able to parlay his shooting ability into tighter defense, and then working hard to drive like that.

by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 10, 2012 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Efficiency

Is there a way to distill efficiency figures per half? Because, if I think back, I don’t recall many empty possessions in that second half. We totally dictated the pace of that game, and seemed to be able to score at will. Also, and h/t to ITH for this tidbit: Free throw rate for last night’s game was 100% (42 FTA, 42 FGA). Zeller shot one fewer free throw than the entire Illinois team.

It’s one thing to do that against a bad Iowa defense. It’s something altogether different to do that against Illinois, which, for all of its other faults, is a good defensive team.

by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 10, 2012 9:17 AM EST reply actions  

I don't understand that 100% free throw rate.

How are FTA and FGA related like that? What is the significance? Surely that doesn’t mean we shot a free throw on every possession?

A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.

by LoneStarHoosier on Feb 10, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Take this with a huge grain of salt

Because I am not a stats guy. But I understand that Free Throw Rate is simply FTA divided by FGA. A high Free Throw Rate is obviously good. I believe that the significance is that teams that get to the line often tend to score a lot of points. Which sounds obvious. But it’s also a good indicator of some of the nuances of last night’s game, as noted by AJ, above. IU got to the rim and drew fouls. Illinois settled for jump shots and did not draw fouls. They made themselves much easier to defend.

by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 10, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s just a ratio, a way of looking at how often the team gets to the line. Absent an offensive rebound, a possession includes either free throw attempts or a field goal attempt. Instead of simply saying “42 free throw attempts,” which has vastly different meaning depending on whether the game is played at IU’s pace or, say, Wisconsin’s pace, it tries to put it in context.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 10, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

those numbers are skewed a bit

as it doesn’t count as a FGA if you miss the shot and are fouled. So Zeller especially, took more shots than the 8 he was credited for, but they weren’t counted in the box score. That’s the reason that our scoring in the paint wasn’t through the roof, because when we had a shot in the paint we were hacked. The ensuing free throws don’t count as points in the paint on a stat sheet.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Weird, I didn't know that about shots that are missed because of fouls.

So, it’s theoretically possible to have a free throw rate higher than 100%?

This is what happens when you take Finite Math rather than Statistics in college. Wish I had done the latter.

A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.

by LoneStarHoosier on Feb 10, 2012 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

yes

theoretically this is possible. In fact, I’d imagine early in the first half it was occurring.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

closest I could find in the first half was 19-16

21-16 at the half.

21-26 in the second half, but we finished on a 1-10 run.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

In yesterday's preview

The question was posed: “Who is going to go off tonight?” Turns out everyone did. Today’s questions:

Who’s big game were you most pleased with? For me, it’s O. I’m glad to see that the Purdue game was not a fluke. Also, if he keeps doing that, he adds yet another dimension to this offense that makes it really, really potent.

What do you do with VJ3 when he returns? IMO, he’ll play about 25 minutes a game still. I expect him to start; that’s a comment on my sense of Crean’s loyalty, more that a comment that he should start. It’s a good problem to have 5 guards worthy and capable of playing time (and I throw Roth in that mix). Jones’s mid-range game is something that the others don’t have.

by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 10, 2012 9:59 AM EST reply actions  

this is very true

Oladipo still doesn’t have the mid-range pull up, which is what limits him somewhat. He’s either going to pass or take it all the way to the rim. You don’t have to worry about him jump stopping at 15 feet and getting an easy basket because you’re racing him to the rim… yet….

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

"Yet"

That “yet” part is one of the more exciting things about this season. I love the progression that Sheehey and Oladipo have made in their games from last year to this year. I love the more nuanced ways that Hulls’s game has evolved in his three years. I can’t wait to see Zeller as a sophomore. If O’s development is in any way linear, then he’ll be outstanding next year. Maybe it won’t be — it’s entirely possible that he’s reaching his ceiling, which is still very, very good. But I appreciate the apparent ability of Coach Crean and his staff to develop players.

Credit where it is (grudgingly) due: Weber and his staff seem to have done a pretty good job of developing Leonard, too. The same could also have been said about Mike Tisdale and Mike Davis, who were basically stiffs that turned into decent players.

by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 10, 2012 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

it's hard to pick just one.

Zeller did a great job keeping his composure and hitting FTs. I applaud him for constantly attacking. He didn’t kick the ball out as often as he usually does and I like that. As the best offensive weapon on the team he needs to learn that it’s ok to be a little selfish with the ball.

Watford finally broke out of his shooting slump which was good to see. I love it when he shoots that ‘kentucky 3’.

Jordy really was doing all the little things last night. Took care of the ball, pushed the tempo when it needed to be pushed, pulled it back towards the end when we needed to run clock, and made some gorgeous assists. The 3 balls didn’t hurt anything either.

VJ3 will start again and will get 20-25 a game when he’s healthy and he deserves it. If he starts playing wreckless Crean can always just take him out for a bit. I LOVE our guard options btw. Especially with Remy’s confidence continuing to increase.

We’ll make some noise in the tourney. Just you wait.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 10, 2012 11:17 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

lol

does he ever miss that Kentucky 3? I don’t think he has once this season and it is one of those shots that I perk up every time it is about to happen.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Feb 10, 2012 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

when Watford shoots that shot

I get the same feeling that comes whenever Roth shoots…from anywhere. I just feel like there’s no chance that it’s going to miss.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 10, 2012 11:43 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Yep. It reminds me of an early 90s tecmo NBA basketball game my roommate had on Sega Genesis where certain players literally could not miss from certain spots.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 10, 2012 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

VJIII will still be a contributor

but I would really like to see him coming off the bench. He is simply not part of the best 5 we can put out there. If he accepted the role I think he would be a valuable role player.

by WhySoSeriousCaptain on Feb 10, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

What I really loved

was our toughness the last two games. Both PU and IL thought they could intimidate us, but we didn’t back down and out toughed them. I jumped up when Cody answered Leonard’s cheap shot with an in your face elbow to the mouth when Leonard got too close. Coach has really been preaching this, and the players are listening. We’re really gelling, and we could win the rest of our league games. IMO, we are the third best BIG team after OSU and MSU.

by My 2 Cents on Feb 10, 2012 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

An indicator that we are learning and improving is

that didn’t happen at Wisconsin – we let them push us around. NO MORE!

by My 2 Cents on Feb 10, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice victory!

And it's now my sig
by Bronn on May 17, 2011 4:56 PM EDT

by Sparhawk on Feb 10, 2012 12:41 PM EST reply actions  

Ok, potentially controversial statement here:

Everyone’s been on Leonard – and for good reason – for how he played last night. Like I’ve been saying: Thuggery in the pivot. But really (and here’s the potentially controversial statement), was he doing anything any different from Wisconsin’s Bruesewitz? I’m telling you all, the only difference is that Bruesewitz hides it better and avoids the whistles. I state that I think Cody got fouled and abused more against Wisconsin than he did last night against Illinois. The difference was, the refs actually called some of it last night.

Really, to me, Leonard is just the more blatant version of Bruesewitz. It’s just that for some odd reason, the latter gets away with it. Anyway, that’s the potentially controversial statement: I don’t think Leonard did anything much different than B does for Wisconsin.

--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."

--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 10, 2012 2:57 PM EST reply actions  

LOL!

Who was it during the Iowa game at the beginning when it looked like they were going to keep up with us? It was something like “I’m sick of goofy looking tow headed white boys lighting it up against us”.

Granted, “tow headed” means blonde rather than than redhead… but still the point was doofy looking white guys – who aren’t dark haired – suddenly looking like their the second coming of Larry Bird’s jumper. It was driving me nuts too, which is why I remembered it.

--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."

--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 10, 2012 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

A sign that this is a good season

I’m disappointed that they aren’t playing this weekend, which would not have been the case the past three seasons.

by thunderpup12 on Feb 10, 2012 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

I was at that Illinois game and was so happy to see Watford step up to the plate with some offense!

by IUGirl on Feb 13, 2012 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

Cleveland Sports Bars....?!?

I’m going to be in Cleveland when we play Minnesota (God help us this time!!)…I’m not familiar with Cleveland and don’t know where to watch the game. Anyone know of any “IU Bars” in Cleveland?

by IUGirl on Feb 13, 2012 4:07 PM EST reply actions  

go to the largest and most popular bar you can find.

There’s bound to at least be a small contingent of IU fans there.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 14, 2012 12:34 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

You might contact the IU Alumni Association. The Cleveland club looks like its website is a bit dead, but someone at IUAA might be able to tell you if there is an official gamewatch location.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 14, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome. I previously blogged about IU at The Hoosier Report for about two years. You can follow The Crimson Quarry on Twitter. E-mail me at crimsonquarry at sbcglobal.net.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cwat_small
ACC/B1G Challenge 2012 Edition
Bizoveruk_small
Strength of Schedule '12-'13
Bizoveruk_small
Lexington Cartoonist Disses Calipari
Watford-shot_small
Crimson and Gold Cup
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
2013 Class
Bizoveruk_small
National Exposure
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
Starting Five Next Year/Jameele McKay
Bizoveruk_small
"Why IU fans suck."
Small
Classy Kentucky Fans
Cwat_small
Thoughts on 2012-2013 Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Crimson-lg_small John M (The Crimson Quarry)

Editors

Small Devin S.

Crean-1_small JustAJ