Indiana 73, Michigan 71: Hoosiers survive.
Despite one of the more lackluster defensive performances of the season, IU never trailed and withstood a late Michigan rally to defeat the #13 Michigan Wolverines. The best thing, and really the only thing that matters, is that the Hoosiers won. There seems to be a fair amount of hand-wringing online today about the Hoosiers performance, and it certainly wasn't their best. Michigan had plenty of open looks from three point range and shot well above its season average from deep. IU lost the turnover battle for only the second time this season and allowed its second-highest offensive efficiency and third-worst effective field goal percentage. The offensive performance was much better, as would be expected against an offense-oriented team such as Michigan, although IU allowed Michigan to stay alive by missing free throws in the final minute. This is a game that any of the previous three IU teams, and perhaps several others in the last 15 years, would have lost (see last year's home game against Iowa, for instance).
Here is the box score. As noted, IU played pretty well offensively other than the turnovers. IU shot 55 percent in each half, and was 7-11 from deep. IU didn't rebound particularly well on the offensive end, but that doesn't matter as much when the shots are falling. Individual performances of note:
- A couple of months ago, we were hoping that Christian Watford would find a way to live up to his potential. Now, I'm hoping that we can hold onto him for another year. 25 points, 8-11 shooting, 3-4 from deep, 7 rebounds.
- Jordan Hulls was somewhat invisible offensively, shooting 1-4 and 1-1 from deep.
- Victor Oladipo had a rough night offensively, shooting 2-10, but he had 4 boards, 2 steals, and 2 blocked shots.
- Matt Roth, of course, drained his only three point attempt, but what is more noteworthy is that he made his first two pointer of the season (on only his second attempt). That's Roth's fourth two-point field goal in the last two seasons.
- Derek Elston played another solid game off the bench, scoring 5 points and grabbing 4 boards, blocking a shot, and had 0 turnovers.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jordy
Anyone concerned that Jordy looked like he wanted no part of the ball in late stages last night? Obviously VJIII’s missed free throws were rough, but all credit to him for taking and making that tough jumper to put IU up 4.
Nah, he will be fine.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 6, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
Fair enough
My concern for the past two years has been that the team still seems conditioned to Verdell to be the “go to guy” when things break down or when they need a bucket. It’s a role that Verdell doesn’t shy away from, but there are better options if they would just come forward. I just wish there were two or three guys who would be more willing to take the game into their own hands in crunch time.
That’s true. And the reality is that Verdell is probably the best guy we have at creating his own shot. The only problem is that he isn’t an overwhelmingly good shooter. It’s an obviously flaw on our team, but we’re 14-1. I would like to see a bit more assertiveness from Hulls, particularly against a team like Michigan that isn’t all that tough on defense, but it’s really not his game.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 6, 2012 10:36 AM EST up reply actions
the difference between this year and last with Jones being the go to guy
is that he is infinitely more willing to share the ball when it isn’t there. He is still a little too willing to force things in an attempt to create and gets a bit out of control, but overall the benefits outweigh the risk when the ball is in his hands.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
Verdell always finds a way to make me not hate him late in the game
as much as I do during the game. But he needs to take care of the ball better the turnovers are just to much and eventually it’ll bite us in the ass. However I am pleased with another hard fought victory over a ranked opponent, perspective is most of us at the beginning of the season would’ve been happy with an NIT selection, now we are sniffing the AP top 10.
Mr. T pities the fool who wonders "how much jib could a jibba jabber jabba if a jibba jabber could jibba jabbas."
by Ditkavsworld on Jan 6, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
I wasn’t concerned about Jordy, but I did think he should have held on to the ball during that possession. I understand wanting to kill some clock, but since you knew Michigan was going to fall, why not keep it in the hands of your best FT shooter? My suspicions were confirmed when Verdell missed the front end.
A couple of thoughts:
1. When I opened this post, the ad at the bottom of the page encouraged me to “Embrace the Awesomeness of Zubaz pants.” I wonder what that says about us or about me that the ad robots would target that for me.
2. This game was pretty terrifying. It’s one thing to get out-and-out beat by a team that out-executes or out-athleticizes (what?) you over the course of the game. But it’s a whole different animal when you lead for most of the game and (almost) give it away due to boneheaded turnovers, missed shots, and bizarro threes off of offensive rebounds of other threes from your foe. I mentioned last night that I’m still shellshocked from Game 6 of the World Series. Even many hours later, the feeling resonates.
3. I can’t wait to see what a year or two will do for Cody. When he wants to score, he just does. It would be nice to see a focus on getting the ball to him in the last ten minutes of the second half, where he has a tendency to disappear of late. Some of that is foul trouble, and some of it seems to be nerves. I can’t wait to see him get over that hump.
4. Predictions for the next six games? 5-1? Sound good?
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 6, 2012 10:29 AM EST reply actions
Yes, 5-1 would be stellar.
Especially if the one loss if a gut-wrenching ALMOST-win at OSU. Everybody is saying that the Buckeyes are going to exact their revenge on the Hoosiers in blowout fashion, but we should have WS back by then and you knowhe wants to do some damage. Plus with the meshing of Zellford we’re only going to get better. Ah, I love this season. So, so much.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 6, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
Going 5-1 over the next 6 would put IU at 7-2 at the midpoint and would give IU a chance to be in the Big Ten race until the end. I still think Wisconsin will right the ship, so 4-2 seems like the most reasonable projection—not that we can overlook PSU or Minnesota or even the Huskers.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 6, 2012 10:40 AM EST up reply actions
Nothing is for granted.
I have seen Big ten races completely change throughout the season. The big problem for IU is road games. How consistently can they win on the road. You win 5/9 on the road, IU has a chance to win the Big ten, because I dont think anyone can beat IU at home. that means winning at PSU, at Neb, at Iowa, at Minnesota for sure. then you have at Wisc, at OSu, at Purdue, at Michigan. You need to win one of those…tough task for IU.Not impossible tough!
by spartynation on Jan 6, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
Re: #3
I can’t wait to see what a year or two will do for Jordy, Remy, Yogi, et al, in learning how to get the ball to Zeller consistently, and in crunch time. I think that he disappears only because no one feeds him the ball.
Re: #4: 5-1 is what I expect. Lose at tOSU, but win the rest of them.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 6, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
if IU goes 5-1 over the next 6
you should expect the Hoosiers to win out after the Ohio State game. Wisconsin is still Wisconsin and it is still very hard to win in Madison. It took Michigan State over time and Iowa was an anomaly.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
it took Izzo 11 years to beat Bo at Kohl.
of course we have lost some games at UW in bizarre ways and every heartbreak possible in the book.
by spartynation on Jan 6, 2012 11:41 AM EST up reply actions
sounds like IU at Breslin.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 7, 2012 5:17 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
General annoyance-
This isn’t necessarily directed at anyone here but…can we PLEASE all lay off of VJIII. He’s a good defender, he can be great in the clutch, and sometimes (this point is key) he’s the only one who is able to get the ball down to Zeller. Also, the guy deserves respect because he’s been with us through the bad times. I will say that I wish Abell would get more playing time, but I rarely am upset when Verdell is on the floor. I truly think that we’re a better team with him out there.
When he isn’t missing the front end of 1 and 1s and turning it over.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 6, 2012 10:48 AM EST reply actions
Agreed
VJ3 is what he is, and last night was a classic game from him. Some good assists, some boneheaded turnovers, a dumb foul, and then a stone-cold fadeaway to ice the game (well, kind of).
Actually, it was not classic Verdell. There is a marked difference this year with him on defense, as well as Watford. Both of them have seemingly worked very hard to make themselves better defenders. Mind you, that has brought them up to “average”. But neither of them is a defensive liability any longer. Jones did a good job on Burke last night.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 6, 2012 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
Amen
I’ve been a Verdell apologist in the past but how anyone can complain about what he’s brought to the table this year is beyond me. How anyone can complain about anything, especially the doofus complaining about Jordy, when the team is 14-1 is a mystery to me.
Verdell has given quite a bit to this program, and I’m extremely happy that he, Pritch, Roth, and Moore likely will end their careers in the NCAA Tournament. He was thrown to the wolves as a freshman who really wasn’t ready, has fought through a bunch of injuries, and has improved meaningfully as a player every single year. Remember when he was knocked cold by that screen in the Cornell game his freshman year? He has his limitations, but he’s out there because he’s our best option right now.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 6, 2012 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
Verdell never would have gotten serious minutes at IU
if it weren’t for the collapse. But he came, and he got those minutes, and now he’s a middling B10 guard with no fear and tons of experience. I imagine he’s a great resource in practice, since he’s played 3+ seasons against every team in the league. Aside from Hummel, Jones might be the most seasoned guy in the B10. Finally, for better or worse he is able and willing to make something happen with the basketball.
I may wince a little when the clock is winding down and Verdell Jones has it near the top of the key, but that’s my scarred memory, and I’ll always appreciate the kid. There’ll be a time next season when Yogi dribbles into a trap or gets his stuff blocked, and we’ll find ourselves thinking that Verdell wouldn’t have made that mistake.
Credit where credit is due:
Michigan played a good game last night. There was some chatter leading up to the game that Michigan’s ranking was underserved, or based solely on the buzz coming into the season. Maybe. But that is still a very good basketball team that played a good (but also flawed) game last night. To the extent that IU got away from what had given them some leads in the game, they did so because Michigan got after them and made them get away from it.
This is Thunderpup’s statement from this morning, so credit here goes to him as well: But there appears to be a clearly-established caste of the 4 best teams in the conference this year. Bucky, Sparty, Michigan and IU, in no particular order. We are one of those four. We’ve now played the other three, are 2-1, and have held serve on our home court, in two games that were not our best games. Take a breath. Tap the head of your Brian Evans bobble head doll. It’s all good.
Also, many thanks to Purdue for getting that one out of the way. Now we can head to Pennsylvania with the surprise having been sprung, and issue a curb-stomping.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 6, 2012 11:17 AM EST reply actions
Oops
By Bucky, I meant “Buckeyes”, obviously.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 6, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Wouldn't count Wisco out just yet.
They’ve been shitty the last few games but they definitely have the talent to come back and finish the B1G season strong.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 6, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
This is a good point
Wisconsin can right the ship and likely will given Bo Ryan’s track record.
Still at this point in the season, I think it is fair to say that Wisconsin is not at the level of OSU, MSU, UM and IU.
Agreed
Wisconsin will right the ship, but I would expect them to be, at best, 10-8 in conference. I don’t know that they have the depth of scoring talent to get beyond that. But at the same time, they’ll continue to be a tough out, especially in Madison. We can win there, but we’ll probably have to play better than we did last night.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 6, 2012 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
Think we'll have Sheehey back for that?
Does anybody have an idea of when he’ll be back?
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 6, 2012 1:52 PM EST up reply actions
They (Dakitch and Obrien) said they think the 20th but Will hoped earlier.
Mr. T pities the fool who wonders "how much jib could a jibba jabber jabba if a jibba jabber could jibba jabbas."
I'd expect Will to take a couple of games to get back into form
I don’t expect much out of him the first half of the Big Ten season, which is another reason to be really encouraged by this start.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 6, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
I actually just got done watching the game on my DVR
and yes it was hard for me to not check scores on any of my electronic devices as well as not watch any sports programming just so I would be able to watch the game and not know the outcome. Overall the Hoosiers played a solid game offnesively, free throw’s were ok, I think Olidipo did soem great things but just wasnt hitting his shots, but his impact on the game overall was never in doubt. VJ3 is playing much better this year and he does still piss me off from time to time but when we need him the most he usually comes through.
I’m loving the 1,2 punch that Watford and Zeller are brining and I think when Sheehey comes back that will only elevate the overall game even more. I think Jordy will be ok but he needs to take better control of the point at the ends of the games, he’s a smart player with a killer 3 point shot and sometimes when he doesn’t get going early offensively he almost disappears, but he still is playing pretty solid D.
I think overall we will see IU come out with a much better defensive performance against PSU and if we can shoot like we did in the UM game I’m not worried. I think this team knows it can play with anyone but is still playing hungry and with a chip on their shoulder. Like I said above if I told you that IU would be 14-1 at this point in the season most people would’ve called me crazy. But this team is special and I know that at some point we will drop another game but that in no way will dimminish what this team has already been able to accomplish.
Mr. T pities the fool who wonders "how much jib could a jibba jabber jabba if a jibba jabber could jibba jabbas."
This is the least satisfying kind of win
The one where you get off to a good start, ride up to a comfortable double-digit first half lead – and then watch that lead shrink to nothing and hang on for the “whew” kind of victory.
But, that can be what you get in conference play. Most of these teams are too good and too well coached to just let you pull away. Michigan definitely fits that bill – they have an offense, and the players, to score threes, and they are extremely well-coached. So, we can be a little disappointed in how the game went, but give some credit to the other side and move on with the win.
First post.
I’m glad I found this blog. Its one of the best I’ve seen. Now, lets go Hoosiers!

by 












