Big Ten Weekly Review: Kinda Halfway-there edition
Well, we're sorta at the halfway point in Big Ten play, so I went ahead and listed each teams' per-possession performance alongside my ramblings about how strong or weak each teams seems to be right now. Speaking of per-possession performances, I'd to take a moment and mention one of my weekly must-reads over at Basketball Prospectus, John Gasaway's (or TAFKATBTW) Tuesday Truths have a marvellous run-down of pace, per-possession efficiency (and efficiency margins, of course), and a bit of commentary on Big Ten basketball in the state of Indiana.
It was sort of a slow week, with many teams only playing one game, but there was a bit of movement in my updated standings, below the jump:
1. Ohio State (7-2) W v. PSU, v. Michigan
Two double digit home wins have the Buckeyes now on a nice four-game streak going into Saturday's game at Wisconsin. Furthermore, Matta has time to prepare for whatever faces them in Madison this time around.
The Buckeyes are atop the tempo-free stats, as well, with only Michigan State and Indiana's offense to equal them, and noone near their stout defense. And how about Lenzelle Smith, Jr.? First he kills IU with an unexpected offensive explosion, and then kills Michigan by nabbing 12 rebounds, eight (8!) offensive, and chipping in 17 points (no threes!). It seems just unfair to have an extra horse like that in the stable, so to speak.
Points Per Possession: 1.11 (tie-2nd)
Opponents Points per Possession 0.83 (1st)
2. Michigan State (6-2) W v Minnesota
Even though the Spartans only played one home game last week, I'm comfortable returning them to the number 2 spot. Their tempo-free stats are as gaudy as OSU's, although the two teams have yet to play. While I'm also comfortable predicting that OSU is the better side, I think that Tom Izzo's club is currently the only other Big Ten team I am confident that will get through the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. I'm very interested to see if the top-notch offensive numbers can continue for the Sparties.
Points Per Possession: 1.15 (1st)
Opponents Points per Possession 0.96 (tie-2nd)
3. Michigan (6-3) W@ Purdue L @ OSU
The offense and defense are solid, but Michigan just didn't have the horses to hang with Ohio State in Columbus. And who does? Salvaging a road split by edging Purdue on the road was pretty important, as the Wolverines have yet another road game at Michigan State this weekend. Along with the MSU game, tomorrow's hosting of Indiana should show where the Wolverines are exactly in this second tier of teams. Also, reserve big man Jon Horford appears to be finally able to return from injury, in good news for Michigan fans.
Points Per Possession: 1.04 (tie-4th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.01 (5th)
4. Wisconsin (6-3) W v. Indiana
The Badgers held off Indiana at home, but they shouldn't feel too good about it. UW needed the calls they got (and I'm not complaining, just noting that they needed them) to hold off IU at home, and honestly look vulnerable going into the backstretch. Combining this with a narrow win at Illinois, it appears the momentum they had recaptured in January may be fading, and 5 of their next 7 games are on the road. Additionally, one of the home games is hosting Ohio State this weekend, so I wouldn't buy stock in Bo Ryan's club at this point.
Points Per Possession: 1.03 (tie-6th)
Opponents Points per Possession: 0.96 (tie-2nd)
5. Indiana (5-5) L@Wisconsin, W v. Iowa
Another week, another home win and road loss for the Hoosiers. However, IU appears to be getting it together a little bit, and it has a lot to do with Verdell Jones III. AJ posted a nice article about his performance earlier, but the thing that really jumps out at me is that over the last five games is that Verdell's assist/turnover ratio is a pretty decent 2.3:1.
I don't know if he's ever been so efficient. Also, the last five games, starting in the second half against OSU, is really where the the adjustments of Indiana's players to Big Ten basketball have started to show up. And scoring over 100 points against a conference team without a three-point barrage is really impressive, and rare. But, that defense...
Points Per Possession: 1.11 (tie-2nd)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.10 (tie-9th)
6. Purdue (5-4) L v. Michigan, W @ Northwestern
After a two-point loss at home, the Boilers went out posted a two point road win over a slumping NU team. The surprising thing here is that the Boilers have actually been able to put together a decent offense this year, which I thought would be their chief challenge. No, the challenge appears to be that the defense is now thoroughly sub-par, and Robbie Hummel is finding himself at center to make room for the under-sized but effective DJ Byrd to play at the four-spot. This has become a small team, and it's hard to play good defense in this league when you're undersized. Terone Johnson had perhaps the game of his young life in Welsh-Ryan arena, and appears to finally be rounding into shape as a capable off-guard.
Points Per Possession: 1.04 (tie-4th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.07 (8th)
7. Minnesota (4-5) W v. Illinois, L @ MSU
The Gophers have now gone 4-1, although the loss at Michigan State showed that this still isn't a team to pencil into the Big Dance just yet. The road games this week at Iowa and Nebraska should really shine some light on whether Minny is a team that has just benefitted from timing and schedule, or whether they have managed to re-define themselves post-Mbakwe into a real second-tier Big Ten team (which I mean as a complement).
Points Per Possession: 1.02 (8th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.02 (6th)
8. Illinois (4-4) L @ Minnesota
In one of those cruel irony finishes, Meyers Leonard (who has been the defensive stalwart for the Illini this season) foolishly fouled Austin Hollins while allowing him to finish the play at the end of regulation, giving the Golden Gophers the chance to redeem their season-opening loss at Illinois. I think Illinois is still the better bet than Minnesota to get at an at-large bid, but they also could totally play themselves out of contention for the second time in three years.
Points Per Possession: 0.98 (tie-9th)
Opponents Points per Possession 0.99 (4th)
9. Nebraska (3-6) W @ Iowa
Another first for Doc Sadler's club, who got a honest-to-goodness conference road win, beating down the slumping Hawkeyes. They now look like they are the best of the bottom tier, although they certainly won't challenge for an at-large spot this season. Bonus per-possession note - According to my back-of-the-napkin talley, in the conference games that Diaz and Talley have played, the Huskers have scored 0.95 points per possession (good for, well, still last, but a tie with Penn State for last) and their opponents have only scored 1.02 points per possession (good for a tie 6th place in the conference). It doesn't move them up a lot in either standing, but it would put their current efficiency margin at a much more competitive 9th (-0.07), rather than dead last.
Points Per Possession: 0.88 (12th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.05 (7th)
10. Northwestern (2-6) L v. Purdue
It was another bad week for Northwestern, with a disappointing home loss to a beatable Purdue squad. Sippin' on Purple has been harping on this, but Carmody has got himself into a jam by having too few scholarship players. So, frosh Tre Demps is taking a medical redshirt year, JerShon Cobb & Alex Marcotullio have been unavailable/unhelpful
also due to injuries, but when redshirted forward Michael Turner was obviously not ready for Big Ten play - this left NU with only 7 scholarship players, plus walk-on Reggie Hearn. Now they've got Hearn playing big minutes, and Luka Mirkovic and (rarely) Nick Fruendt coming off the bench. It's way too much to ask four starters to essentially go the distance every game in this too-tough conference.
Points Per Possession: 0.98 (tie-9th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.10 (tie-9th)
11. Iowa (3-6) L v. Nebraska, L@Indiana
Trying to find a silver lining about a home loss to Nebraska and a road blowout loss to the Hoosiers? Iowa is only the second conference team to score as many as 89 points in Assembly Hall in the Tom Crean era. In fact, only the Evan Turner-led Ohio State (Jan.31, 2009) and John Wall-led Kentucky (Dec.12, 2009) teams have ever managed this feat. This, of course, is all far overshadowed by the total collapse of the Hawkeye defense right back to its lowly pre-conference form.
Points Per Possession: 0.88 (tie-6th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.14 (12th)
12. Penn State (2-7) L @ OSU
The cruelest cut here is not that the Nittany Lions lost a blowout at OSU, but that Billy Oliver is experiencing concussion-like symptoms. He's had a history of concussion problems, which has doctors watching him closely and makes it very probable that his season is over. Oliver, of course, was the key reason that PSU was able to blow away Purdue and start scaring opponents into providing enough space for Frazier to operate. Jon Graham, Ross Travis and Sasa Borovnjak's all have various good qualities to contribute, but Oliver's presence was very helpful for the PSU offense.
Points Per Possession: 0.95 (11th)
Opponents Points per Possession 1.10 (tie-9th)
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Aaaaaand there's MSU's regression to the mean
Nice game, Illinois & MSU.
Also, it is because I’m individualistic or just plain ol’ contrary that I get disappointed when the other Power Polls (Inside the Hall and Hoosier Scoop) are too similar to mine?
Good Lord
IU outscored the combined output of both teams in both games last night. Of course, Iowa also outscored both teams in the Sparty-Illinois game. There’s a legitimate question to be raised about whether IU’s style of play, particularly with the horses that have now arrived and are set to arrive in the next couple of years, will help them succeed by being a change of pace from the rest of the conference crowd. In my opinion, it will.
But aside from that, just the aesthetics of IU’s style is so much better. I watched some of the Sconny-PSU game last night, and my eyes did not stop bleeding until this morning. It was just Tim Frazier and Jordan Taylor in isolation moves for the last 10 minutes. It was all of the worst parts of the NBA, minus the talent. Gah.
by hoosierdaddynow on Feb 1, 2012 9:43 AM EST up reply actions
Back in the Big Ten Wonk’s heyday, the late Davis years for IU, he spent some time lamenting the Big Ten’s style of play, which then ranged from slow to slower. I don’t have a problem with that style of play, generally, but currently, Iowa, IU, and Ohio State are the only Big Ten teams that like to push the tempo. Those teams range from 68 to 70 possessions per game, with Iowa ranked #44, IU ranked #83, and OSU in between at #68. Michigan State is #166, but is at 66.8 so isn’t all that far behind the first three. Every other Big Ten team is ranked in the mid-200s or below in possessions per game, with Michigan, Wisconsin, and Nebraska all ranked below 300 out of 345 D-I teams. I do think our pace is an advantage.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 1, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
it gives me hope for the tournament.
Sometimes even if you play great D in the tourney some team just starts shooting the lights out (see VCU) and if you are incapable of pushing the pace to get some quick and easy points (see Purdue) you can end up getting blown out by an 11 seed.
That being said IU doesn’t play great D. I’m starting to think that won’t be corrected by tournament time. So we will need to be able to score a ridiculous fuckton of points.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 1, 2012 11:01 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I’m limiting my tournament hope to “getting there.” I’ll be surprised if we don’t, but a win or two this week would increase my confidence exponentially.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Feb 1, 2012 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
I'm expecting to split the games this week and then take care of business at home the rest of the way.
That, I expect, will be plenty good enough for a 6 seed. I can’t help but look ahead to the tourney. It’s been so long since we’ve made the dance that I’m giddy with anticipation. Also, I’m going to be in Vegas for week 2 of the tourney so I desperately hope IU makes it that far so I can bet lots and lots of $$$ on them.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 1, 2012 11:33 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
How do you think they split?
Win at Michigan or win at Purdue?
The insane, pure-id Courage Wolf part of me thinks they win both by 20 points.

Methinks Courage Wolf is on-point.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Feb 1, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
Win tonight, close loss at Purdue
IU can win at Crisler – I don’t see a huge homecourt advantage in Michigan’s games (Minnesota, Northwestern, and MSU all came very close to winning there), and the Wolverines seem to have come down off of their peak a little bit. And anytime Purdue has had a halfway-decent team, it’s been really hard for the Hoosiers to win at Mackey.
lose by 6 tonight then beat Purdue by 2 (w Hummel missing a 3 at the buzzer).
Purdue has no post presence and I simply don’t think they can outscore IU. Plus they’ve done a really good job of letting down their fans this year (Xavier, Butler) that I don’t see why they’d want to stop now.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Feb 1, 2012 2:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I prefer slightly fast, but mixed pace is an advantage
One of the point’s that I thought Gasaway was making too, was that having slow teams was fine, but having a conference full of slow teams not only made the games look boring, but possibly was putting the conference at a disadvantage when the postseason rolled around. Having both kinds of teams give the Big Ten teams that do go into the postseason some real experience with coping and counter-acting different styles of play.
It was all of the worst parts of the NBA, minus the talent. Gah.
Agreed. Aesthetically, I hate the iso-clear-outs, but it looked like the crucial parts of that game that should’ve been high drama were really just a series of missed shots and trips to the foul line.
Also, who would’ve guessed that point total in Wisconsin-PSU’s game would better MSU-Illinois’s… let alone by 15 points?

by 











