Indiana 103, Iowa 89: Hoosier offense explodes.
After a rough five-game stretch and with a four game losing streak to Iowa, most of us were hoping for a strong statement and a comfortable win against Iowa, and we got exactly that. While there were plenty of flaws in the Hoosiers' performance, particularly defensively, IU led by 17 at halftime, never really let the Hawkeyes back into it despite a very strong second half shooting performance by Iowa, and posted its highest point total in Big Ten play since scoring 112 on Iowa in 1995. To put this offensive performance in perspective, this is the first time since IU's 108-88 win over George Washington in the first round of the 1999 NCAA Tournament that IU has scored 100 or more against any opponent other than a pre-conference tomato can. IU's 1.385 points per possession was the fourth-best offensive performance of the Crean era, and the other victims have been Howard, Stony Brook, and South Carolina State.
Of course, the other side of the coin is that Iowa's 1.197 points per possession was IU's second-worst total of the season. Perhaps I should be, but I'm not overly concerned by that. I think there is a natural tendency in a game where a team scores at the rate that IU was scoring to ease up a bit on defense. Unquestionably that happened, and in addition, Iowa simply shot the ball very well. Some of it was attributable to IU's defense, but Iowa hit some fairly well-contested shots. Also, at the final media timeout, with 3:50 remaining, IU led 96-75, at which point Tom Crean began clearing the bench. From that point forward, Iowa scored 14 points on six possessions. At the final TV timeout, Iowa was averaging 1.10 points per possession, which isn't a great defensive performance, but the Hawkeyes' garbage time run definitely had a significant impact on the final stats.
As it was, however, the Hawkeyes had an excellent shooting day, finishing at 63 percent from the field and at 79 percent in the second half. The most encouraging thing about IU's performance is that the Hoosiers excelled in areas that have been problems. First, turnovers: IU's 13 may seem like a high number, but in a 74 possession game, it comes out to 17.5 percent, IU's third best performance in Big Ten play. Iowa turned the ball over on 22.9 percent of its possessions, which is IU's second-best defensive number of the Big Ten season. Also, the Hoosiers dominated the offensive boards, grabbing 57.1 percent of OR opportunities and leading to 23 second chance points. IU shot only 4-16 from the perimeter, compared to 8-15 for Iowa, but IU's rebounding performance led to 13 more shot attempts and 10 more free throw attempts (IU was 25-31 from the line compared to 13-21 for Iowa).
Individual notes:
- Cody Zeller had his best game as a Hoosier. I think we have found the key to "GET THE BALL TO ZELLER!!!" IU needs to convince all of its future opponents to collapse on the ball whenever a guard drives into the lane. Got it, Michigan? Got it Purdue? You don't want to give up a bunch of 10 foot floaters to Verdell Jones III. Zeller scored a career high 26 on 11-2 from the field, most of which were uncontested layups or dunks. He had only four rebounds. Perhaps his wrists were sore from making so much contact with the rim.
- Verdell Jones III was only 4-10 from the field but finished with 14 points thanks to 6-7 from the line and he also had 9 assists to 3 turnovers.
- Tom Pritchard had an excellent game off of the bench, scoring 7 points and grabbing 4 boards (3 offensive) in 13 minutes.
- Derek Elston was instrumental in IU putting some space between the Hoosiers and the Hawkeyes in the first half.
- IU changed its lineup for the first time all season, switching out Will Sheehey and Victor Oladipo, and the change went well for both of them. Sheehey scored 10 points and had 4 boards in 22 minutes, Oladipo had 12 points and 6 boards in 23 minutes.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Iowa's half time points per possession was 0.95
so I think that hints towards a bit of a letting up by Indiana in the second half. That isn’t necessarily a good thing, but when you’re cruising and up by 20 a majority of the time, I can see some relaxation on defense.
Verdell Jones’ reemergence over the last two games could be what Indiana needs to make a hard run to finish the season.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
Yep. Even noted perfectionist Bob Knight didn’t mind stuff like this. I recall a game once where IU had a huge lead at halftime and then was modestly outplayed in the second half, and Knight’s response was something like, “well, then I’m glad we were up 20 at halftime.”
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 30, 2012 9:51 AM EST up reply actions
I'm annoyed that seemingly every mediocre offense we play has some nothing player go off for career highs against us.
Our defense is bad, but what’s even more irritating is the number of “I can’t believe that went in” shots that always seem to go in. Maybe the karmic cost of Watford’s buzzer beater is this parade of unbelievable shots against us by previously-mediocre basketball players.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 30, 2012 9:28 AM EST reply actions
I think a lot of those "I can't believe that went in" shots are a result of a high number of them being shot
similar to the Colts in football with Manning. Indiana’s offense is so high powered that it causes teams to force those kinds of shots in games when they’re down. Iowa had a few last night, Nebraska had one or two, and Penn State had a couple. They’re just shots that Ohio State’s and Michigan State’s don’t take because they’re in a game. Hell even Michigan had a few as they tried to fight their way back into the game in Bloomington.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
I noticed a subtle problem last night.
It seems as though IU actually starts off defensive possessions pretty solidly – every guy’s got his man, he’s positioning himself well, he’s paying attention to the cuts and screens the opponent is throwing, etc. – but over the course of a few passes, it starts to break down. At least one guy manages to start getting separation from his defender via cuts and just running through the lane mess and forcing the IU player to fight through just to keep up. And that starts it all. At that point, one of the Hoosiers – sometimes Zeller, but anyone else, really – starts to cheat position-wise to help Jordy or Wil or whoever’s drawn the “chase the rabbit” assignment keep their guy in check. And suddenly, BAM, open lane or open shot.
I don’t know what the answer is, but my hypothesis (the defense breaks down due to incessant opponent movement leading IU players out of position eventually) survives one sanity check in the response Crean throws: He calls a zone sometimes. He didn’t do that last night that I recall, but remember other games where we suddenly started moaning at seeing IU go into a 2-3? I think that’s what Crean’s trying to shut down: The positional degredation that occurs when IU’s guards simply have trouble keeping up and IU’s bigs start to cheat over to help.
If I’m right (and I’m definitely subject to correction by someone who’s better at analyzing that sort of thing on video review), the IU has the ironic problem of getting beat on defense because the players are being unselfish. 
Anyway, I only noticed that last night. And I’m not certain I’m right on the ball about it, but it’s something to think about. And if anyone’s got anything to add to this – or better yet, if anyone wants to correct any error they see in my analysis – please feel free to sound off. It’s worth discussing, even if just for pure geek-headed curiosity’s sake.
--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."
--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."
I would buy that!
The improvement in help defense this year has been noted in other places (i.e. Grantland) during the OOC schedule. It makes sense that an upgrade in the talent of the opposition would cause breakdowns in the way you described, especially with guys like Hulls, who is a short guy playing out of his natural position.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 30, 2012 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
Unfortunately Purdue gets a long breather in W Laffy...
…to prepare for IU. No games between last Saturday and this Saturday. I predict two close losses this week.
depends
I think it all hinges on the newest article on the front page. :-)
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
That’s a realistic assessment. I’ll be very happy if we can win at Michigan, because it would limit the importance of the Purdue game from a resume perspective (obviously, it’s always important in its own right). But yeah, I have little optimism about the game at Mackey. Far better IU teams have lost there to far worse Purdue teams than this one.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 30, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
win at Purdue and the rest of the season looks gravy
I would have said the same thing about Wisconsin. Purdue is vulnerable and going into an incredibly hostile environment and sending them for the doors before the game finishes would provide the necessary confidence to finish the schedule with a bang and go into the tourney feeling pretty good.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
isn't the game on ESPN?
If so IU probably wins. Purdue is insanely awful on national TV.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 30, 2012 10:35 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I don't think so
I believe this is the first time in something like 10 years that IU-Purdue is not a nationally televised game.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
Correct. Both are on BTN. Networks probably are kicking themselves.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 30, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
crap
Was hoping they’d choke like they do anytime a national audience is watching. Oh well. Hope Crean has some tricks up his sleeve to keep CZ out of foul trouble since no one at Purdue will be able to guard him. Not playing in Madison will help. No Teddy Valentine would help out greatly as well.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 30, 2012 1:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Maybe we should sew the blue “NCAA” patches on our jerseys. The sight of those things usually causes the Boilers to clench tight enough to make a diamond.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 30, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
this!
I desperately want to go to the game at Mackey on Saturday as I am confident for a multitude of reasons. Tix are just hella expensive.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 30, 2012 2:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
wish we had more than three days for this kinda smack talk
just gonna have to wait until March to get more time I guess.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
In my house, "boilermaker" is a synonym for turd
“Man, the cat left another boilermaker on the rug. I think I should take him to the vet.”
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 30, 2012 2:29 PM EST up reply actions
They would pick this year, of all previous years, to make that call.
It’s difficult to recall a year in the past 10 in which both Indiana and Purdue were nationally relevant at the same time.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 30, 2012 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
2008 fits the bill. Of course, in that year, the Big Ten’s stubborn refusal to have protected rivalries in basketball meant that IU and PU played only once (Sampson’s last game, which IU won).
IU and Purdue both have made the NCAA more often than not from 2001 to present, but 2003 and 2008 are the only time both schools have made it in the same season over that stretch.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 30, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
Pretty easy to see why
IU wasn’t expected to rise as quickly as they have, and Purdue was going down (pretty easily call to make after losing two star players).
I’d rather give up an ESPN game this year to have one in two/three years when both squads are supposed to have better rosters.
by AustinP0027 on Jan 30, 2012 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
As a bald man
I wholeheartedly approve of Sheehey’s shaved dome. In fact, I think they should all do it now.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 30, 2012 11:08 AM EST reply actions
Didn't the team do that in 2007 or 2008?
Maybe before that? I think maybe Bracey Wright was involved. It was a throwback to MJ.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 30, 2012 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
Some men look good with a shaved head. Rik Smits isn’t one of them.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 30, 2012 11:49 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
saw him the other night
his son as a middle schooler to early high schooler is roughly in the 6’7" range.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
That's funny. On the ITH live chat last night, some of us discussed the opposite:
Sticking various players in an izfro.
Stop and think about that: Could you imagine Zeller in an izfro? We’d have to start calling him Q-Tip: All stick, until the big poof at the top. 
--------
"First they came for the ugly, and I did not speak out because I was not ugly.
Then they came for the nerds, and I did not speak out because D&D IS A RESPECTABLE GAME WITH A LARGE PLAYERBASE OK MOM???
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out because let's be real they always come for the Jews.
Then they came for me, and I did not speak out because they actually came for me back when they came for the nerds."
--
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."
Great offensive performance, but to be honest...
That might have been the worst defense by an AQ Conference team I’ve seen in more than a decade…me thinks the Hawkeyes will be doing plenty of wind sprints in the coming days.
by CoreyMichaelDC on Jan 30, 2012 11:21 AM EST reply actions

by 














