Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Two Minutes Of Thunder Basketball Wins The Game

Indiana Hoosiers @ Wisconsin Badgers: can IU win a Kohl for the first time since 1998?

Wisconsin Badgers

Current record: 16-5 (5-3)
Current RPI: 32 (IU is #20)
Current Sagarin: 8 (IU is #11)
Current Pomeroy: 3 (IU is #11)
2010-11 record: 25-9 (13-5), lost to Butler in NCAA Tournament Sweet 16
2010-11 RPI: 16
2010-11 Sagarin: 12
2010-11 Pomeroy: 7
Series: IU leads 94-63
Last IU win: 1/31/2007 (71-66 in Bloomington)

Last Wisconsin win: 3/3/2011 (77-67 in Bloomington)
Last IU win in Madison: 1/25/1998 (69-59)
Pomeroy scouting report
TV: 9 pm Thursday, ESPN2

Blog: Bucky's Fifth Quarter

Indiana tries to end two long losing streaks to Wisconsin when the Hoosiers travel to the Kohl Center tonight. When I say two losing streaks, I mean this: first, IU has lost 8 in a row to the Badgers. It's been nearly five years since IU beat Wisconsin, and because this is the only regular season meeting between the teams, it likely will extend to six years if IU doesn't win tonight. The last time IU had a 9-game losing streak against a Big Ten opponent? Against Purdue from 1929-1935. That's the first streak. The second is that IU has lost 10 in a row in Madison since the Hoosiers won at the Kohl Center for the first and only time in 1998. Bring back the Fieldhouse! This is a remarkable turn in a series in which IU won 31 in a row from 1980 through 1996. Before the current 10 game losing streak in Madison, IU's 10 previous losses at Wisconsin came in 1997, 1980, 1978, 1971, 1968, 1963, 1959, 1955, 1947, and 1943. IU's losing streak in Madison is second only to the long drought in East Lansing.

Star-divide

In the early part of the season, Wisconsin looked fairly vulnerable, and has not been the overwhelming force that it usually is at home. The Badgers, who were undefeated at home last season, already have three home losses this season (to Marquette, Iowa, and Michigan State) and Nebraska played the Badgers close, ultimately losing by five. Nevertheless, Wisconsin seems to have righted the ship during its four game winning streak, which includes road wins at Purdue and Illinois.

By now, in the eleventh season of the Bo Ryan era, Hoosier fans should know what to expect from UW. An extremely slow pace (59 possessions per game, #344 in the nation and a full 9 possessions behind IU's 68.8 pace), very strong efficiency numbers at both ends of the court, decent rebounding numbers, excellent offensive turnover numbers, and a defense that excels at field goal defense but doesn't take many chances or force many turnovers. In conference play only, Wisconsin is #3 in defensive efficiency, while IU is #3 in offensive effiiency; Wisconsin is #6 in offensive efficiency while IU is #11 in defensive efficiency (thanks, Northwestern!).


FG 3PT FT Rebounds Misc
G M M A Pct M A Pct M A Pct Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF PPG
Jordan Taylor 22 35.6 4.5 11.5 39.7 1.5 4.5 34.3 3.5 4.7 74.0 1.0 3.2 4.1 4.4 1.5 1.1 0.0 1.7 14.1
Jared Berggren 22 26.7 4.1 9.0 45.7 1.3 3.5 38.2 1.1 1.5 78.1 1.3 3.6 4.9 0.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 2.3 10.7
Ryan Evans 22 28.9 4.0 8.5 46.5 0.3 0.9 31.6 2.0 3.0 69.2 1.5 5.1 6.6 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.1 2.0 10.2
Ben Brust 22 26.1 3.4 8.0 41.8 2.0 5.0 39.1 0.8 1.0 85.7 0.5 2.3 2.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.9 9.5
Josh Gasser 22 32.9 2.4 4.9 48.1 1.2 2.4 51.9 1.5 2.1 72.3 1.0 3.6 4.6 2.0 1.4 0.7 0.1 1.7 7.5
Mike Bruesewitz 22 24.5 2.2 5.1 42.5 0.9 2.4 38.5 1.1 1.7 67.6 2.0 3.0 5.0 1.3 1.1 0.5 0.1 2.2 6.4
Rob Wilson 22 9.8 0.8 2.2 37.5 0.3 0.9 31.6 0.6 0.8 76.5 0.5 0.8 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.6 2.5
Frank Kaminsky 21 8.0 0.9 1.9 46.2 0.3 1.0 27.3 0.2 0.5 50.0 0.8 1.0 1.7 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.5 1.2 2.2
Traevon Jackson 13 7.0 0.6 1.5 42.1 0.2 0.6 37.5 0.2 0.2 66.7 0.5 0.9 1.4 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.6
J.D. Wise 6 1.7 0.5 0.5 100.0 0.2 0.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
Jordan Smith 6 1.8 0.3 0.5 66.7 0.2 0.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
Duje Dukan 12 3.3 0.3 0.6 57.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 25.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.8
Evan Anderson 13 2.7 0.3 0.5 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.6
Dan Fahey 8 1.6 0.1 0.3 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3

The last time these two teams met, Wisconsin's Jordan Taylor torched IU for 39 points, and overwhelmed what was a pretty solid performance (by 2008-2011 standards) for IU. Taylor got off to a rough start offensively this season, and his shooting percentages are significantly lower than they were last year, but he still is perhaps the most complete guard in the Big Ten, as an excellent point guard and the Badgers' top scorer. As always, the Badgers take a ton of three pointers (41 percent of their shots, #2 in the nation). The Badgers are only #8 in three point shooting percentage in Big Ten play, although that probably is skewed deceptively because of the Badgers' awful performance at home against Iowa. What really strikes me about this Wisconsin team is that they don't seem to have the sort of height they have had in previous seasons. Jared Berggren is the only Badger over 6-6 who plays more than ten minutes per game. Berggren, however, will be an interesting matchup for Cody Zeller at both ends. Berggren scored 18 points on 7-14 shooting in Wisconsin's win at Illinois.

This is a tough but not unwinnable game. The IU team of the first 13 games of the season absolutely could win this game, but the effort and execution, particularly on defense, will have to be better than what IU has shown over the last three weeks. This game begins what is the toughest remaining stretch on the Hoosiers' schedule. IU travels to Wisconsin tonight, plays Iowa at home on Sunday, travels to Michigan next Wednesday, and then goes to Purdue a week from Saturday. IU could play well and still end up 1-3 in the stretch and 5-1 overall. If that happens, it is far from the end of the world, as IU finishes with 5-7 at home. Still, if this team wants more than the bubble, it would be very nice to steal one of these next three road games against good-but-not-elite teams. Let's hope it starts tonight.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

My two cents

And if you want to page Mr. Obvious, that’s fine: get the ball to Cody and go at Berggren every possession. Make him foul. Berggren is a good player, but I don’t think that he can defend Cody without help or fouling. If you take Berggren out of the mix, then you make their offense one-dimensional.

Granted, the same could be said of our offense if Cody gets in trouble. But Cody’s a true low-post threat. Berggren’s better with his face to the basket.

Also, if you are paging Mr. Obvious, please also put in a call for Good Watford. He needs to show up tonight.

by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 26, 2012 10:42 AM EST reply actions  

its possible, but unlikely.

To win Oladipo will have to at least contain Taylor, Cody needs a big game, and roth and hulls need to hit some 3s.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 26, 2012 1:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Watch for Indiana to push the ball a lot tonight to try and bump the tempo

they won’t generate a lot of turnovers but on defensive rebounds and inbounding after a made shot, we’ll likely see a lot of the ball being raced up the sidelines. Settling into a half court game against Wisconsin would likely be the death of us.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Jan 26, 2012 2:22 PM EST reply actions  

I agree completely

And I like the way that we goose the tempo in that way, even when there are not turnovers. Might be able to get 8-10 points in that way, which may make the difference in a game like this.

by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 26, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

this

Think abell gets any PT?

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 26, 2012 3:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I hope you're right.

I want to see the end of the standing-around-waiting-for-the-offense-train thing to stop. Be agressive on the boards.

A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.

by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 26, 2012 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll believe a win at Kohl when I see it.

The team needs to get better quick, or Wisco needs to revert to their awful shooting form from earlier this season. I did watch part of the Michigan-UW game, and the Wolverines really played excellent perimeter defense. They also pushed the ball when they had a chance. We need a similar degree of effort and execution – that’s the recipe to a road win.

by nothsa on Jan 26, 2012 4:11 PM EST reply actions  

My hope tonight

is that I put off watching Archer until after the game. If the first half is bad, I’ll just watch Archer at 10.

For some reason, I have a decent feeling about tonight. IU played far from perfect against Nebraska and Penn State, but the level of play was better than the Minnesota and Ohio State games.

by thunderpup12 on Jan 26, 2012 4:39 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome. I previously blogged about IU at The Hoosier Report for about two years. You can follow The Crimson Quarry on Twitter. E-mail me at crimsonquarry at sbcglobal.net.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cwat_small
ACC/B1G Challenge 2012 Edition
Bizoveruk_small
Strength of Schedule '12-'13
Bizoveruk_small
Lexington Cartoonist Disses Calipari
Watford-shot_small
Crimson and Gold Cup
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
2013 Class
Bizoveruk_small
National Exposure
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
Starting Five Next Year/Jameele McKay
Bizoveruk_small
"Why IU fans suck."
Small
Classy Kentucky Fans
Cwat_small
Thoughts on 2012-2013 Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Crimson-lg_small John M (The Crimson Quarry)

Editors

Small Devin S.

Crean-1_small JustAJ