Indiana at Nebraska: the Hoosiers need a win badly (preview).
2010-11 Pomeroy: 60
Blogs: Corn Nation, Big Red Network
Indiana is on its first losing streak of the season, and desperately needs a win. This week provides an excellent opportunity for a mini-winning streak, but IU's first trip to Lincoln in nearly 70 years will not be easy.
Because this is the first meeting between IU and the Cornhuskers since NU joined the Big Ten, it's worth taking a look at the Huskers' basketball history. First, I am pleased to have Nebraska as a member of the Big Ten. They are an excellent fit geographically and culturally, and the addition of NU's top-shelf football program gives the conference four of the top nine football programs (by winning percentage) in college football history. And, of course, IU holds a 9-7-3 lead in the football series between the schools, and yes, I will milk that statistic until it is no longer true, and I don't care how bad the Cornhuskers were in the 1940s. All that said, much as when Penn State joined the conference two decades ago, the basketball program is the least appealing part of the package. Nebraska is one of only three teams in the power six conferences--Northwestern is one, South Florida the other--that has never won a game in the NCAA Tournament. Here are how Big Ten schools rate in total number of NCAA appearances:
Indiana 35
Illinois 29
Ohio State 27
Michigan State 25
Purdue 25
Iowa 22
Michigan 22
Wisconsin 17
Minnesota 11
Penn State 9
Nebraska 6
Northwestern 0
Northwestern and USF are the only major conference programs with fewer NCAA bids than the Cornhuskers as well. NU's first NCAA bid came in 1986, under Moe Iba, and then Danny Nee led NU to appearances in 1991, 1992, 193, 1994, and 1998. Again, all appearances resulted in first round losses. Nebraska's list of 1,000 point scorersdoesn't have many household names, but Hoosiers may recall Eric Piatkowski, drafted by the Indiana Pacers in 1994 but traded before he ever played a game, Tyronn Lue, a role player on a couple of Lakers' championship teams recently, and Jack Moore, who led Muncie Central to the 1978 state championship before playing at NU (he died in a plane crash in 1984).
When Penn State joined the conference, IU and Penn State had never played in football and had met only twice in basketball. IU has played Nebraska 19 times in football and 9 times in basketball, although in both sports there have been few meetings since the middle of the 20th century. This will be the sixth time IU has played Nebraska in Lincoln. IU holds a 4-1 advantage there, is 3-0 against the Huskers in Bloomington (most recently a 97-60 win during IU's undefeated 1974-75 regular season). The most recent meeting was in December 1982, in the Hoosier Classic in Indianapolis. This will be IU's first game in the Devaney Center, the Huskers' 13,600 arena (leave it to Nebraska and Michigan to set their priorities by naming their basketball arenas after football coaches), which opened in 1975. This is the Huskers' second-to-last season at Devaney. In 2013, NU's basketball teams will begin playing in the new 15,000-seat Pinnacle Bank Arena currently under construction in downtown Lincoln.
Nebraska's current head coach is Doc Sadler. He has led NU to three NIT appearances in his first five years on the job, and took UTEP to the NCAA Tournament in 2005. He has only one losing season in his first 12 years as a college head coach.
The Huskers' overall numbers this season are a bit depressing: 9-8 overall, 1-5 in the Big Ten. Still, the Huskers have played pretty well against a brutal opening slate. The Huskers' lone win was at home against Penn State, but NU has played well in its last two road games, five point losses at Illinois and Wisconsin. Their recent improvement (and IU's poor play of late) has been noticed by Vegas, at least: Pomeroy predicts that IU will win this game by 10, but the betting line, which usually is pretty close to Pomeroy is 4.5.
In Big Ten play, Nebraska's defense has been respectable. NU is allowing 1,.02 points per possession, and in certain respects has been very good: NU is #1 in Big Ten play with 22 percent three point defense, is third in defensive turnover percentage at 21.5, and #1 in steal percentage of 12.5. Obviously, a hot start by IU from behind the arc would be a very good sign, and would make it tough for the Cornhuskers, because NU has been horrible offensively. NU is averaging only .83 points per possession on offense, has rarely been to the line in Big Ten play, and turns the ball over quite a bit (22.9 percent). NU doesn't rebound very well (21.9 offensive rebounding percentage, while allowing 36.3 on defense), and has been brutal from behind the arc in Big Ten play (26.9 percent).
The Huskers' leading scorer is LSU transfer Bo Spencer. He is averaging 14 points per game, but is requiring nearly 13 shots a game to get there, and is shooting 37 percent overall and only 31 percent from three point range. He leads NU with 2.9 assists per game. Toney McCray had been NU's most effective shooter from deep, making 39 percent of his three pointers. The Huskers have pretty good size, with 6-11 Jorge Brian Diaz and 6-10 Brandon Ubel inside.
Well...what do we think about this one? I have no earthly clue what to expect. Given NU's offensive struggles, this seems like a good opportunity for IU to rediscover the tight and disruptive defense that characterized the Hoosiers' play in November and December. On the other hand, NU's strong defense might extend the offensive struggles that have characterized IU's play against Minnesota and during the meaningful part of the Ohio State game. I hesitate to use the term "must win." I've always thought that this could be a tough game, and if IU hadn't lost to Minnesota at home, I wouldn't be so worked up about this game. If IU loses tonight, then we may well be back where we thought we would be at the beginning of the season: the bubble. There is no guarantee of that. IU could lose tonight, win its remaining home games, steal a couple of road games, and finish 24-7. But there have been bad signs brewing for a couple of weeks, and hopefully we will see some meaningful improvement tonight if nothing else.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just want a W.
We don’t need to blow out the huskers. I don’t even care if we play especially well. Simply need a W. Damn that Minnesota game. I wouldn’t be worried in the least if it wasn’t for that stupid Minnesota loss. Even still, that 4.5 pt vegas line is appealing.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 18, 2012 10:20 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I would be worried even if we had won, because you can still draw a downward sloping line connecting our defensive efficiency stats.
That line needs to change direction.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 18, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
it will.
The slump is over. Everyone has adjusted to B1G play and we’re going to see that tonight. Also, even though I love me some VJ3, I think Crean might start giving Remy more minutes at the expense of Verdell and it’ll be for the best.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 18, 2012 2:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I think if anything
Roth is going to see more time at the expense of VJIII, but I don’t think it will be much.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
that's alright too.
Since I like Roth just as much as Remy.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 18, 2012 3:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Roth seems to have improved greatly on defense after last season.
Of course, it’s another year and he’s playing more. I hope he can take another stop.
A sassy, brassy, classy lassy.
by LoneStarHoosier on Jan 18, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
That kinda depends on the matchup
Roth and Remy bring some different skill sets to the table. Roth can guard a guy if he’s someone who you have to make him put it on the floor. He’s probably alright in this game, so long as he does not end up stuck on Spencer due to some switch on a screen. But he brings more offense than Remy does. I’d be kind of interested to see a lineup that has Remy, O, and Sheehey at the 1-3 spots, and see if we can just absolutely shut down the perimeter on defense.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 18, 2012 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
I still would be concerned if it weren’t for the Minnesota loss, but if we had won that game, I could convince myself that we were going to be a tough out at home. That game made it feel like every game is loseable. And if we keep playing like we have since the 10 minute mark in the Michigan game, any game is loseable.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 18, 2012 1:53 PM EST reply actions
on the flip side
I still feel like every game on the rest of our schedule is winnable. Offensive firepower is still there. Defense I have faith that Crean can shore up. The last 2 games were a wakeup call. Everyone will come out tonight playing hard and playing well. I can feel it.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Jan 18, 2012 2:16 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I agree with you
What I am watching to see tonight (and every night from here on out) is whether the team answers the wake up call and responds, or continues to play in somewhat of a funk. The problems have been in execution. The problems the last three years were indemic, given the make up of the roster. This can be fixed. I am watching to see that it does get fixed.
by hoosierdaddynow on Jan 18, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions
keep the gamethread rolling. I will be wrangling toddlers.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jan 18, 2012 6:39 PM EST via Android app up reply actions

by 











