Blogpoll final ballot.
Here it is:
The Crimson Quarry Ballot - Week 16
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama Crimson Tide | 1 |
| 2 | LSU Tigers | -1 |
| 3 | Oklahoma St. Cowboys | -- |
| 4 | Oregon Ducks | 2 |
| 5 | Arkansas Razorbacks | 2 |
| 6 | Stanford Cardinal | -2 |
| 7 | South Carolina Gamecocks | 2 |
| 8 | Wisconsin Badgers | -- |
| 9 | Michigan St. Spartans | 4 |
| 10 | Michigan Wolverines | 1 |
| 11 | USC Trojans | -6 |
| 12 | Boise St. Broncos | 2 |
| 13 | Baylor Bears | 2 |
| 14 | West Virginia Mountaineers | 7 |
| 15 | Kansas St. Wildcats | -5 |
| 16 | Georgia Bulldogs | -- |
| 17 | Oklahoma Sooners | 2 |
| 18 | Virginia Tech Hokies | -1 |
| 19 | Florida St. Seminoles | -- |
| 20 | TCU Horned Frogs | -- |
| 21 | Clemson Tigers | -9 |
| 22 | Houston Cougars | 3 |
| 23 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | -5 |
| 24 | Texas Longhorns | -- |
| 25 | Missouri Tigers | -- |
| Dropouts: Penn St. Nittany Lions, Southern Miss. Golden Eagles | ||
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings "
Discussion below.
Like everyone else outside Dixie, I was not particularly enamored of the SEC vs. SEC matchup for the BCS title. I wouldn't be opposed to a rule limiting the title game to conference champions, or finding a way to disfavor regular season rematches. But the rules are what they are, and as I said in posting my final regular season ballot, LSU and Alabama had the two best regular season resumes and therefore deserved to play in the title game, despite the coincidence that they are from the same division. That's not to say that I went into last night's game determined to give my number one vote to the winner. LSU won the regular season game 9-6 in overtime on Alabama's home field. Had Alabama won in similar fashion last night on a neutral field, I would have given serious consideration to voting LSU, because LSU's road win would have been more impressive than Alabama's neutral field win, and head-to-head would have been a wash. As it happened, the dominant performance by Alabama made my final vote a pretty easy decision. There is a lot of talk about Oklahoma State, but even assuming roughly equivalent accomplishment in the win column, the fact remains that Oklahoma State lost to 6-7 Iowa State, while LSU and Alabama each handed the other its only loss. There simply isn't a compelling argument for taking the position that Oklahoma State has a better resume than either of the SEC teams, and I feel obligated to use my BlogPoll vote to rank the teams in order of accomplishment, not as a soapbox about how college football should be reorganized. The teams played this season under the rules that exist, and deserve a fair vote based on those rules.
I have to admit that I don't have strong feelings about the rankings on the final ballot other than at the top. If anyone sees any obvious howlers below the top 5, let me know.
1 comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Pre-arrainged Marriage" aka Nat'l Championship Over
NOW can they address how to avoid such a flawed system? Or do we have to go another year, 2 years, or a decade before they fix this?
-Over 40 days between end of Regular Season and the Title game… and it showed, offensively at least.
-Several teams deserving of a shot at the Nat’l Title, but more so in previous years.
-A Champion that didn’t even win it’s Conf Title? A Champion that split games with the runner up and lost to that team AT HOME.
I wouldn’t mind an SEC SEC matchup if it played out in a +1 or Playoff, but to arrange the matchup with other deserving teams is yet another questionable chapter in the most controversial system in all of sports… THE BCS.
The NCAA has one of the best Tournaments in March Madness as well as one of the worst systems in the BCS. Hopefully they fix it soon. The solutions are out there, but they seem enamored with this $$$-driven addiction to the current BCS formula.
Proudly banned from Stampede Blue
Naptown Tees: www.naptowntees.us

by 
1
-1











