Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

Indiana Hoosiers 38, South Carolina State Bulldogs 21: sloppy win.

IU ensured that however ugly the 2011 season might get, 0-12 at least will not enter in to the equation.  IU pulled out to a 24-7 lead against South Carolina State and then traded scored with the Bulldogs, ultimately winning 38-21.  This was a strange game.  It never seemed that IU was in danger of losing, but there were some tense moments, and the Bulldogs pulled within 10 points on two occasions during the second half.  Still, as I said last night, a win is a win, and a few FBS schools lose in these games every year, and we won't be on that unfortunate list.

Star-divide


The IU offense was very effective, for the most part, particularly in the early going.  IU scored on four of its first five possessions, although slowed down in the middle of the game.  As I said in my preview, defense has been SCSU's strength, but the Bulldogs didn't have much luck keeping the IU offense in check, especially in the first half.  IU had 29 first downs, 557 yards of offense, and gained 6.1 yards per play.  IU converted 6 of 10 third downs.  On the downside, however, were an incredible 19 penalties for 144 yards.  I really don't know what to make of this. IU had three penalties against Ball State and 6 against Virginia, so they have not been an overwhelming problem before, but they were on Saturday, and on both sides of the ball.  IU has 12 penalties on offense, including 7 false starts (3 by Peyton Eckert, 2 by Andrew McDonald), 3 holding (2 by McDonald), plus a substition infraction and intentional grounding.  The defense had 5 penalties, and 4 of them were for offsides.  Some of the offenses were by young players, including true freshman Eckert.  Andrew McDonald is harder to figure.  I'm willing to assume that it is a one-game glitch, but it's an issue that warrants watching.

The defense continues to be a concern as well.  IU allowed SCSU, a team whose offense had shown little punch in the first two weeks, 4.2 yards per carry and 5.5 yards per snap.  The inability to outmuscle a FCS team does not bode well for the Big Ten season, and the offense isn't yet where it was last year, although there is plenty of promise. 

Individual performances:
  • Edward Wright-Baker was 21-27 with 2 TDs and 273 yards and no interceptions.  He did fumble the ball once, which is becoming an issue and, as Gerry Dinardo pointed out on the telecast, related to his failure to protect the ball once he decided he was going to run.  Dusty Kiel completed 4-6 passes in his first action of the season, but didn't look good in the one series he played after Wright-Baker's fumble. 
  • True freshman D'Angelo Roberts may have emerged as IU's top running back with his 19-102 performance.  He gained 47 yards on one crucial drive in the third quarter after SCSU pulled to within 10.  He certainly was more consistently able to gain significant yardage than Stephen Houston or Matt Perez, although both of those guys scored touchdowns.
  • Kofi Hughes is quickly becoming an important part of the offense.  Hughes caught 3 passes for 47 yards, including a 40 yard TD, and gained 45 yards on the ground on 2 carries out of an end around-type play.  Hughes was a very good high school quarterback, and it seems certain that he will throw out of that play at some point this season.
  • Duwyce Wilson caught 6 passes for 101 yards and made some really nice catches, including on a TD at the back of the end zone; Damarlo Belcher added 6 for 36 yards.  EWB continues to spread the ball around: 9 different Hoosiers had catches. 
Well, IU is in the win column for the first time this season.  The penalties are a concern, as is the defense.  The Hoosiers next head to Denton, Texas to take on 0-3 North Texas.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Big Ten Review: Week 3

Sep 2011 from Black Shoe Diaries - 51 comments

Big Ten Preview: Week 4

Sep 2011 from Black Shoe Diaries - 24 comments

Comments

Display:

Glad to finally get that W

Duwyce was on fire in this game, coming up with multiple huge catches. The penalties were a major concern, because they were all mental mistakes. You cant have that many false stars/offsides, its completely unacceptable. I thought the O-line did a good job, considering giving 3 guys their first college start. Eckert was killing me, I wasnt very impressed with his play, especially how slow he was in pass blocking, and when he got 2 penalties in a row. I didnt notice much out of Bernard (I think?), but Collin Rahrig (RS Frosh, #64) who started at right guard was actually quite impressive and stuck out to me, of all the linemen. He was quick off the ball, and although undersized for an O-linemen, he battled hard and blocked to the whistle, which i didnt notice out of the other linemen most the times. He was also pretty sturdy in pass-pro…. hopefully coach wilson can get a few more pounds on that frame. I also thought that D’Angelo ran very well,he was pretty impressive and really made a statement to start receiving more carries. The defense was our defense…. there was the good, the bad, and they made enough plays to contain SCSU’s athletic QB and backs. Good Win Coach Wilson, Good Win Hoosiers, keep getting better everyday, Go Hoosiers!

by Paulie58 on Sep 18, 2011 9:16 PM EDT reply actions  

A win- and some thoughts

This was my first IU game in person. It was Freshmen parents weekend, and I was there to see my daughter and finally see some Hoosier football (I am an FSU fan and Alum). Here are my thoughts

The Good:
1. Great set of receivers. They combine good hands with nice moves and yards after the catch.

2. The running backs ran hard and ran North and South.

3. They “won now”, and plenty of playing time for the new players.

4. The offense responded to ever SCSU score.

The So-So:
1. The offensive line. See Paulie58’s comments above, however I would add that late in the third quarter after SCSU scored to bring the game back to a 10 point spread, the O-lline dominated SCSU and IU drove the field almost excluseivly on runs of 3 to 7 yards. I know it is SCSU, but it is better than nothing.

The bad:
1. The crowd. I am sorry, but with a student body of 40,000, a huge alumni base, campus only a 45min drive from Indy, low ticket prices and no other major program in the southern part of the state to compete for attendance,there is no excuse for not filling a 54,000 seat stadium. Furthermore, the crowd peaked at the end of the first quarter and slowly dwindled after that. I know that the student stands were facing the sun and it was sunny and warm, but so is every stadium in the south. This game was not in the bag until the 4th quarter. This is a program that needs more fan support. I had a great time at the game, and I assure you if the fans show up and are enthusiastic IU will win more games.

by newIUfan on Sep 19, 2011 8:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Believe it or not, attendance has improved compared to the early 2000s, particularly in the student section. I’ve long been a skeptic about marketing, but IU has done a nice job of increasing attendance, although winning is the only long-term cure. Just a few things to remember about IU’s program. We’ve been to the Rose Bowl once. We last won a conference title in 1967 and have only come close once since then (1987). We haven’t beat Michigan since 1987. We haven’t beat Ohio State since 1988. We have never beat Penn State. We have gone 1-7 in the Big Ten in 7 of the last 9 seasons. We have won 3 of our last 14 against Purdue. We have one bowl appearance in the last 17 seasons. I would love to see Memorial Stadium full for every game, but I really don’t think our attendance is that bad considering the product.

I think the fan base is there. IU averaged close to capacity crowds from 1988-1991, when IU was regularly reaching minor bowl games and was competitive, if not always successful, against the big boys. But it’s going to take modest success to get there.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Sep 20, 2011 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah,

The crowd was pretty weak for this game, especially the student section…. But i’ll blame that on the nice weather and everyone being more interested in staying outside to tailgate than actually going to see them play SCSU. The attendance has been increasing for the past few years, theyve done a great job of making the games more accesible and reasonable to go to with dropping ticket prices, and $5 student tickets, and i think it wouldve been alot different if they were 2-0 instead of 0-2 heading into this game. They did have a good crowd against Virginia, but they just dont sell it out like they should (see: losing records). It’ll continue to increase and become an more electric atmosphere as long as Coach Wilson can keep putting up the W’s.

by Paulie58 on Sep 23, 2011 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome. I previously blogged about IU at The Hoosier Report for about two years. You can follow The Crimson Quarry on Twitter. E-mail me at crimsonquarry at sbcglobal.net.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cwat_small
ACC/B1G Challenge 2012 Edition
Bizoveruk_small
Strength of Schedule '12-'13
Bizoveruk_small
Lexington Cartoonist Disses Calipari
Watford-shot_small
Crimson and Gold Cup
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
2013 Class
Bizoveruk_small
National Exposure
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
Starting Five Next Year/Jameele McKay
Bizoveruk_small
"Why IU fans suck."
Small
Classy Kentucky Fans
Cwat_small
Thoughts on 2012-2013 Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Crimson-lg_small John M (The Crimson Quarry)

Editors

Small Devin S.

Crean-1_small JustAJ