Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

Indiana Hoosiers Depth Chart: Defensive Line

There is no sugar-coating it. Indiana’s defense is and always has been pretty terrible. With a new coach in Kevin Wilson we are hoping to see that change. Coach Wilson is an offensive genius and lacks the defensive mind that Indiana dreadfully needs but that is where Doug Mallory and Mike Ekeler come in. Both have a pretty strong pedigree when it comes to defense and hopefully their coaching can turn it around.

The D-Line specifically will be returning many players from last year and will look to be building onto that experience with some growth at their positions. The strong point for the line this year should be the tackles as they are returning the most veterans to the line. Hashing out starters on the defensive line is somewhat of a difficulty. There are four juniors that will likely get the majority of the playing time in a rotation at defensive tackle. So instead of listing two guys and then depth I am just going to put them all in the starter category because of the chance that they’ll all get pretty equal opportunity to see the field.

The Starters

Mick Mentzer: The Fort Wayne junior is the first up at the defensive tackle position. An athletic and versatile member of the team has seen positions all over the field in his time with the Hoosiers. He has finally settled in at DT and will be the go to guy when big plays are needed. His athleticism and size should keep him in the mix as he led the position in tackles for a loss last season at 4.

Adam Replogle: Replogle will round out the "starters" at DT this year. He has a great ability to use his speed to get up under tackles and find leverage along the line. He is a bit smaller for your prototypical defensive tackle but his quickness gives him an advantage over many offensive linemen. There have even been points in his career where he has had some reps as a fullback in the offensive backfield. 

Star-divide

Larry Black Jr.: The potential in Black is great. The hulking junior has the capability of eating up blockers and providing single teams for the DEs and LBs to slip through into the back field. At 6’2" 312 lbs he is a black hole type player. If he can just convert some of the potential into on the field success he has the chance to have a break out year and be in consideration as a professional in two.

Nick Sliger: At 6’3" 290, Sliger is another guy with a lot of potential that is still yet to have been converted to success. He was one of Indiana’s top high schoolers in 2008 and has battled to succeed in the ever competitive Big Ten. If he can use his reps on the field to show what he’s capable of he could also be a potential pro candidate in a year. His deceptive athleticism also makes him a pass defense threat if you ask Tate Forcier.

Darius Johnson: Getting the nod at defensive end is Darius Johnson. The IU senior and leader in sacks in 2010 will look to build on an encouraging campaign from last year. Originally signed as a running back he turned DE and has been relatively productive at the position. Quick off the line with an above average spin move he has the ability to create problems for opposing QBs.

Javon Cornley: Probably the most talented member of the Hoosiers defensive line, Cornley will have to prove on the field his talent can translate. The most vulnerable member on the line to lose his spot as a starter is likely Cornley. He is extremely capable of being a top tier Big Ten DE but has yet to show it in his one year of college ball. As for now the tall and long Cornley is the guy that I would slot into the starting DE position but unless he can show it on the field the first person on the depth chart has been making his case loudly in practice.

The Depth

Ryan Phillis: Redshirt freshman Phillis has been making a ton of noise in the bid for his chance at DE and is likely first in line to take over if Cornley can prove he belongs there. Phillis has an outstanding technique that helps him make up for his size deficiency for the position. He is also getting credited with an outstanding motor and the way some talk about him he reminds me of a Jerry Hughes type player; defensive end in college but fast and athletic enough to play a very good outside linebacker in the right system.

Fred Jones: Senior to be, and the first man to get an opportunity to prove himself in practice, Jones will likely find himself on the depth chart and not as a starter. He has good size for a defensive end but hasn’t really impressed the new coaching regime as much as the guys mentioned previously. The senior is likely to letter but most of his value will be seen during the week and not on the weekends.

Kevin Bush: A former walk-on and Army veteran has taken quite an inspiring path to Indiana football. After serving in Korea and a 14 month stint in Iraq, he walked onto the Hoosiers two years ago. The most impressive thing about Bush is that he is a mountain of a man. "He came back jacked up, looking good," claimed Bush’s high school coach Drew Wood when asked about his return from the military. Obviously that size and strength would offer an advantage in a college game. Likely he’ll see most of his action as a special teams monster and not on the defensive line.

Adarius Rayner: Rayner is one of those strange players that has only been playing football for three years previous to college. Yet his inexperience didn’t keep him from recording 20 sacks his senior year. One would imagine that if he has been that good that quickly at the sport that he is very projectable and capable of growing into something special.

Jake Reed: A 5-A All-State Team member, recorded 51 tackles and 9 sacks last year as an athletic end in a competitive system. Reed is likely more depth currently but has the potential to be a big time contributor in the future.

Bobby Richardson: The poster child for why it is important for lesser programs to get in on projectable guys early is Bobby Richardson. It took until his senior year for him to blow up and garner the attention from bigger schools but it was already too late. IU had made it’s headway early and landed the breakout star. Most people that follow football understand that Florida H.S. football is a different animal from what we experience in Indiana. Florida is to football as Indiana is to basketball. That being said, Richardson had a senior year of 76 tackles, 37 for a loss, 5 sacks and 2 forced fumbles. Need I say more about what he is capable of?

Bernard Taylor: A DT by trade, the incoming freshman had committed to IU, de-committed after the Lynch firing and recommitted in January this year. So I guess you could technically call him Kevin Wilson’s first recruit at Indiana. Likely to be depth this year he did have a big season at DT, recording 67 tackles, 10 sacks and 7 tackles for a loss. He rounds out a strong freshman class at the defensive line in terms of potential but I imagine it will take some time for them to make a push for big playing time.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Let me save John his rant

It matters not that Wilson has an offensive pedigree. You are correct, in one sense, that the important work is on Mallory and Ekeler. But Wilson also plays a key role here, regardless of his offensive inclination, that will be the difference between business-as-usual in Bloomington and actually becoming a competitive program. Here’s what he has to do, and by all accounts thus far, he’s the guy to do it:

1. Recruit Big Ten-caliber players. Tyler Replogle, Adam’s brother, is the poster child for this. As a player, I loved Tyler Replogle in every way that I can feel comfortable with. He over-achieved. But he was undersized. He was David Eckstein in shoulder pads. Every program needs guys like that, and I have no problem with having lots of them on IU’s team. But if your starting defense is made up of Ecksteins, guys who are “athletic” defensive linemen, you are not going to cut it. You need to have guys that won’t get plowed downfield by the massive offensive lines at Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio State, etc. I have confidence in Coach Wilson to recognize and rectify that.
2. Squeeze every drop of effort from the talent you have. I posted this elsewhere, on OTE, I think, that I expect IU to lose a game this year that it should not. I also expect Wilson to chew on the team’s ass for a week, and for them to come out and absolutely unload on whoever has the misfortune of playing next. It seems that, particularly on the defensive side of the ball, predecessor coaching staffs have allowed guys to just hang around their talent ceiling. And you need a coach, and a staff philosophy that challenges guys to bust through that. From what I see and hear of Coach Wilson, he brings that kind of philosophy.

by hoosierdaddynow on Aug 23, 2011 9:49 AM EDT reply actions  

As Hoosierdaddynow knows, I have a practically memorized rant against a particular contributor on OTE who suggests that IU was in need of a defensive-minded coach to “fix” the defense, as if there were something in the water that guarantees IU a proficient offense and a bad defense. It’s just a reactive, “replace a skinny Pope with a fat one” idea.

I don’t see AJ’s statement as being quite in that vein. At his introductory press conference, Wilson said that his most important hire would be the defensive coordinator (coordinators, as it turned out). Certainly, all of his experience is on the offensive side (as an aside, it’s interesting that there isn’t more back-and-forth in this regard). Where I might disagree is with the idea of a sharp contrast between an “offensive mind” and a “defensive mind.” They really are two sides of the same coin. It isn’t like the difference between an electrical engineer and a ballet teacher. To be as successful as Wilson has been as an offensive coordinator, he must have some ability to think like a defensive coordinator. He has to know what makes it tough on an offense and what makes it easy as an offense. So, I would guess that from a philosophical and motivational and personnel perspective, I would expect Wilson to be quite involved in the defense. From a teaching and technique perspective, obviously that will fall to the defensive coaches, who have much more experience with that than Wilson.

I do think there is a particular danger for a rookie coach with an offensive background to focus too much on the offense and not enough on the defense. I think Cam Cameron and Charlie Weis are examples of this. I know that Wilson hasn’t yet announced (at least I don’t think) whether he will be calling plays. I won’t be upset if he does so, but I think it’s important that he not get tunnel vision and retains the ability to make the macro strategic decisions that fall to the HC. If I had a vote, I probably would want one of the OCs to call the plays with Wilson having and using his veto power.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Aug 23, 2011 10:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Well stated, counselor

By the way, a suggestion about some additional content after we have finished off the position depth charts: coordinator profiles. There was some talk about it awhile ago. Now that the merry-go-round has stopped and the situation seems to have stabilized, I’d like to know more about Ekeler and whoever it is that is the OC. I know a little about Mallory, but virtually nothing about anyone else, including the actual identity of our offensive coordinator(s). I attribute that to my own laziness to look it up. But anything you can do to help a lazy (or overworked) brother is appreciated.

by hoosierdaddynow on Aug 23, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

You read my mind.

I’m going to do one of the depth chart profiles to make sure we finish on time, and then I do plan to profile the coaches.

The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog

Follow me on Twitter and Facebook

by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Aug 23, 2011 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I second this.

I’d be interested to see if there will be a shift in defensive philosophy going forward. For a long time I’ve been reading Mgoblog because of the great analysis Brian produces. There’s so much I don’t know, but I always feel enlightened after reading one of his UFRs or analysis of a coaching change, because he really knows what he’s talking about and has the data to prove it.

I wish I knew enough about football strategy and statistics to figure out the following nagging questions:
1. Has Indiana’s defense suffered from a faulty scheme (i.e. trying to prevent the big play by playing 5-10 yards of the receiver and getting subsequently burned for moderate-sized but back-breaking gains), or have we just consistently lacked players with the innate physical tools to stop Big Ten offenses?
2. How much can good coaching and “the system” make up for a dearth of elite players?
3. After looking at their previous bodies of work, what can we expect from our new coaching staff?

Part of me wants to go take some lessons in statistical analysis so I could do it myself.

For God and country—Geronimo, Geronimo, Geronimo
No greater love, no sweeter sin, than red hot brass and ice cold gin.

by LoneStarHoosier on Aug 23, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your questions are good ones

And I don’t have the wherewithal to break it down. I don’t know that statistics will tell you everything, either. My gut reaction is that the first step is good coaching, and getting the most out of what you have. A big part of that is an emphasis on fundamentals like tackling, taking good lines, etc. Another part of it is schematic: creating a system that plays to your players strenghts (or, at least tries to hide their weeknesses). Long term, you have to have the horses to maintain any sort of improvement. Good coaches will figure out your system sooner or later and beat it. Others, like Danny Hope…..

by hoosierdaddynow on Aug 23, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was getting more at your final paragraph more so than anything

which is why I think the co-defensive coordinators will be so important. Like most rookie head coaches, I figured he would start building with his individual strengths and thus leave the manual labor of overhauling the defense to (IMO the very capable hands) Mallory and Ekeler.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
- Follow me on the Twitter for worthless thoughts and IU updates.

by JustAJ on Aug 23, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome. I previously blogged about IU at The Hoosier Report for about two years. You can follow The Crimson Quarry on Twitter. E-mail me at crimsonquarry at sbcglobal.net.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cwat_small
ACC/B1G Challenge 2012 Edition
Bizoveruk_small
Strength of Schedule '12-'13
Bizoveruk_small
Lexington Cartoonist Disses Calipari
Watford-shot_small
Crimson and Gold Cup
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
2013 Class
Bizoveruk_small
National Exposure
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
Starting Five Next Year/Jameele McKay
Bizoveruk_small
"Why IU fans suck."
Small
Classy Kentucky Fans
Cwat_small
Thoughts on 2012-2013 Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Crimson-lg_small John M (The Crimson Quarry)

Editors

Small Devin S.

Crean-1_small JustAJ