Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Indiana Hoosiers v. Chattanooga Mocs (preview)

LOUISVILLE KY - NOVEMBER 22:  Peyton Siva #3 of the Louisville Cardinals shoots the ball while defended Omar Wattad #0 of the Chattanooga Mocs during the game at the KFC Yum! CENTER on November 22 2010 in Louisville Kentucky.  Louisville won 106-65.  (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)

Chattanooga Mocs
Current record: 0-0
2010-11 record: 16-16 (12-6)
2010-11 RPI:  (IU was 191) 
2010-11 Sagarin:232  (IU was 103)
2010-11 Pomeroy: 276 (IU was 75)
Pomeroy scouting report  
Series:  IU leads 1-0.  
Head Coach: John Shulman (7th year, 121-106).
TV: 5 p.m. Sunday, Big Ten Network
Blog: n/a

After a strong performance in the opener, IU turns around in less than 48 hours and hosts Chattanooga Sunday afternoon.  The Mocs have been a solid program under John Shulman, who has led the Mocs to two NCAA Tournament appearances, most recently in 2009.  

Star-divide

Omar Wattad, a 6-5 senior who began his career at Georgetown, is the Mocs' leading returning scorer, and shoots 35 percent from behind the arc.  In all, the Mocs' top four scorers from last year, including Ricky Taylor, Keegan Bell, and Chris Early, return.  I mentioned before the Stony Brook game that the Seawolves are relatively reliant on the three point shot, but it's nothing compared to Chattanooga. Last year, the Mocs took 46 percent of their shot attempts from deep, which ranked #4 in Division I, and that is standard procedure for the Mocs.  So, as with Stony Brook, the Mocs, while hopefully overmanned, should provide a decent test for IU's perimeter defense, which was decent but far from flawless against Stony Brook.  On the other end of the court, Chattanooga's defense was among the worst in the country last year in effective field goal percentage and in both 2 point and 3 point field goal defense.  They also were in the red in turnovers and at least by the numbers do not particularly stand out in any category other than defensive rebounding and getting to the free throw line.  

It was nice to see the Hoosiers dominate the opener, but it will be even better if the team can maintain the intensity they showed Friday night with such a quick turnaround and avoid the sort of letdown that has been characteristic of IU's last few teams.  

 

Comment 1 comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from The Crimson Quarry

Comments

Display:

This game should be of the 40 point variety

anything less than a 35 point win and I’ll be concerned about our defense going forward. Chattanooga lives and dies by the three pointer and fast break points. This should play directly into IU’s hands. If the Mocs want to go uptempo and the Hoosiers play solid perimeter defense, this game should be well over by the half.

Look to see Etherington, Roth and Abell get a lot of second half minutes and for the second consecutive game make you feel really good about the depth of this team for the first time in years.

-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.

by JustAJ on Nov 13, 2011 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome. I previously blogged about IU at The Hoosier Report for about two years. You can follow The Crimson Quarry on Twitter. E-mail me at crimsonquarry at sbcglobal.net.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cwat_small
ACC/B1G Challenge 2012 Edition
Bizoveruk_small
Strength of Schedule '12-'13
Bizoveruk_small
Lexington Cartoonist Disses Calipari
Watford-shot_small
Crimson and Gold Cup
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
2013 Class
Bizoveruk_small
National Exposure
Cody-zeller-300x226_small
Starting Five Next Year/Jameele McKay
Bizoveruk_small
"Why IU fans suck."
Small
Classy Kentucky Fans
Cwat_small
Thoughts on 2012-2013 Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Crimson-lg_small John M (The Crimson Quarry)

Editors

Small Devin S.

Crean-1_small JustAJ