Illinois 41, Indiana 20: Hoosiers start fast but fade faster.
For most of the first quarter, it appeared that IU was going to make a game of it, but Illinois reclaimed the lead before the end of the first quarter and rolled to a win in Bloomington. The Hoosiers started things well, with Shane Wynn returning the opening kickoff for a touchdown, and expanded the lead to 10-0, but IU surrendered the momentum permanently when the Illini returned a Dusty Kiel fumble and took the lead, 14-10, at the end of the first quarter. Here are the official stats.
After fits and starts throughout the Zook era, the Illini may finally have pulled things together. They are 6-0 and have their toughest games at home, so it will be interesting to see where they end up. In light of that, it's hard to be terribly disappointed in the outcome or the effort from IU. Unfortunately, IU had the opportunity to put the Illini in a deep hole and simply could not do it. After IU scored on the opening kickoff, the two teams traded punts, and then IU recovered an Illinois fumble on the Illini 27. That possession ended in an IU field goal, extending the lead to 10-0. Illinois pulled to within 10-7 on a long touchdown pass to AJ Jenkins on a third and long (apparently Kevin Wilson said in the press conference that the corner blitz was a mistake by the player--it wasn't called) and on IU's next possession, the aforementioned scoop-and-score on the Kiel fumble gave Illinois the lead for good.
Unfortunately, Dusty Kiel really struggled. Kiel was only 6-19 for 71 yards. True freshman Tre Roberson was 11-17 for 148 yards and an interception, although much of that came in garbage time. Edward Wright-Baker, while reportedly close to healthy, was deemed not quite ready by the coaching staff, per postgame reports. Still, this was a fairly ugly game at QB, and I don't know what Wilson is going to do from this point forward. Roberson certainly adds much more of a running element than either Wright-Baker or Kiel. We will just have to see what happens.
This was another ugly performance for the defense, allowing 308 yards on the ground to Illinois and allowing 6.7 yards per play (IU averaged 3.9).
Performances of note:
-
In addition to decent passing numbers, Tre Roberson gained 36 yards on 14 carries.
-
Stephen Houston may be merging as the top running back, for what it's worth. He had 14 carries for 68 yards and also had 70 receiving yards, thanks in large part to a nice play in the first half by Dusty Kiel, when he threw a pass while in the grasp (literally, not by rule) of an Illinois defender.
-
Damarlo Belcher may wish that he had gone pro last year. Three receptions, 15 yards.
-
The Hardin brothers, both starting at safety, continue to have an impact. Drew Hardin led the Hoosiers with 12 tackles. That's never the desired role for a guy in the secondary, of course.
-
Adam Replogle had 2 sacks.
IU is now 1-5 and faces the least winnable game on the schedule, the road trip to Wisconsin. There are winnable games remaining on the schedule, but next week's isn't one of them. More on the Badgers as the week continues.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It is too bad they are 1-5. They have been winning the turnover battle and special teams. I have been impressed by their tackles in the open field on punts and kicks. In turn that return on Saturday was a beautiful thing to watch, great blocking and great run. With the exception of the N. Texas game, which IU made a game of in the second half, I U has had a lead in every game, and has been in every game at half or later in the game. The offense has little punch, but I agree I think they have found their runing back (or rather combo, I think Perez has good potential as a situational back). Memo to the coach, we do not have the speed or strength to run a sweep, drop that from the playbook. The receivers continue to underperform, this week because they could’nt get the ball downfield and on target (actually for of a QB problem). I knew the defense would be weak, but I thought that the O would have scored more this year. The D is improving each week. As for Wis.- When I saw they had signed Russell Wilson in the off season – I thought they are going to play for the national title. It is going to be a rough outing, but will not be as bad as last year.
I agree with most of this. I’m not sure that the receivers are really underperforming. It strikes me as a QB issue predominantly. I agree with you on the sweep, but I’m sure that there is some inclination to run stuff to at least make the other team think we are going to do it.
The Wisconsin game is going to be rough. I don’t think there is any doubt about it, but as you note, we have fought in every game this year. Unfortunately, playing to the level of our competition in the BSU and North Texas games probably is going to cost us our bowl eligibility before October is over.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Oct 10, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Can't complain about the effort
I am seeing what I want to see out of a rebuilding year: good effort, improving fundamentals, and a change in the attitude. I listened to the start of the game and was blown away by exactly how many Freshmen and Sophomores are starting. Seems like at least half of the starters are underclassmen. And this game showed that. After awhile, once Illinois found its footing, they were able to out-muscle us.
And for what it is worth, I vote for Roberson to get the majority of snaps. He seems to add another dimension to the offense.
by hoosierdaddynow on Oct 10, 2011 7:54 AM EDT reply actions
Agreed. I need to do a major rundown of the way playing time is being allocated. I wish the IU website tracked snaps for offensive linemen. We are playing a ton of youngsters, and Wilson seems to be going down the juco route for recruiting.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Oct 10, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
just need time and talent
notice that in the top two spots of each depth chart a freshman is lurking. The young guys are getting time and that should pay off in the future. It’s probably a big reason why so many veterans are quitting the team.
-Contributing Writer at The Crimson Quarry.
I agree
the youngsters seem to be buying into Coach Wilson and his system (hardass, no nonsense) much better than the older guys, who spent a few years in the Lynch regime. This season has been rough (and heartbreaking), but I am very optimistic that there will be a quicker turnaround, especially if Coach can get some of the athletes he was so accustomed to at OU.
Recruiting
Rivals has IU recruiting class ranked at #35. While Gunner is a 5 star prospect and thus pulls up the class average, IU has verbal commits (all that you can have at this point) for 10- 3 star players. If he can lock these folks in and pick up a few more players of similar quality, he could make things interesting in Bloomington as soon as next season.

by 












