Tom Izzo, Tom Crean, and Michigan State.
On the first question, Indianapolis blogger Kent Sterling, formerly of 1070 The Fan, seems to think it is nearly a no-brainer:
It would be ridiculous to think that Crean wouldn’t crawl backward over broken glass up the Ruel W. Steele Memorial Highway to I-465 around the eastside of Indianapolis to I-69 up to East Lansing to take the job. Michigan State is loaded like Lindsay Lohan on a week long Amsterdam bender, and Indiana is a long way from the nearest bar.
Michigan State, of course, is an excellent job, and if Izzo does leave, the Spartans’ returning roster will provide a new coach with a decent opportunity to advance to the Final Four and perhaps win a title in his first year. On the other hand, it will be very difficult, perhaps impossible, for Izzo’s successor to approach Izzo’s level of success. As this TOC post notes, when Izzo took over the Spartan program in 1995, MSU’s resume included 11 NCAA Tournament appearances, two Final Four appearances, and a single NCAA title (a title that MSU won in large part because one of the best players in the history of basketball happened to grow up in Lansing). In 1995, Michigan State was a football school with an above average but not elite basketball tradition. Today, after Tom Izzo’s incredible run of 13 NCAA appearances, 6 Final Fours, and another NCAA title, Michigan State is credibly mentioned as a top 10 historical power. It will be a very good job for whomever lands it. Still, it’s not a no-brainer, in my mind, that Tom Crean would leave another program with a top 10 tradition. My quick thoughts:
- Championship-caliber roster (no rebuild required);
- Ties to Michigan State and to the state of Michigan;
- Possible personal appeal by Izzo.
- IU's strong tradition;
- Comfort level in Bloomington/disinterest in moving his family again;
- Long-term job security may actually be better at IU;
- Pride (not willing to leave IU with a .256 winning percentage).
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would be stunned if Crean goes to MSU.
I think you’re right about the pride factor, that Crean won’t want to leave before he gets things turned around at IU. If/when he does, it’ll truly be his program. Certainly nobody could accuse him of riding Sampson’s coattails, and at MSU, he would always be compared to Izzo—and that would be an awfully hard comparison to win. And of course, there’s the issue of whether he’d be MSU’s first pick at all. Fair or not, his stock probably isn’t as high as it was at Marquette.
My guess is that MSU would try to get Brad Stevens or Jamie Dixon, and if that doesn’t work, Brian Gregory will come back to East Lansing. But hopefully this won’t be an issue at all (and the longer Izzo waits to make a decision, I think the more likely it is that he returns).
PP-TPW.
The Only Colors
Rediculous commentary
for many reasons. But the biggest that you don’t even mention: Crean has a $3M buyout on his contract. No way MSU is going to pay that.
Brad Stevens just signed a 12 yr contract at over a million per
his buyout could very well be even more than that, today. It would be awesome if people would think about this stuff before crazy speculation
by Santos Sorrow on Jun 11, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not convinced that $3 million is all that onerous if MSU really thinks he is the guy. IU paid $650,000 to Marquette for Crean’s buyout (I’m not sure if Crean threw in any of his own money) and $750,000 to Sampson to get rid of him. So, not counting Crean’s pay the Sampson-Crean transition cost IU $1.4 million. $3 million is more than that but not absurdly more. If MSU were certain that Crean were the right guy, I don’t see why that number would be a dealbreaker.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Jun 11, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions
It's a good commentary.
$3 mil isn’t that much money for one of the more successful college basketball programs in the land. They have a huge incentive to maintain that image. Your comment is the more “rediculous” of the two.

by 











