Indiana v. Ohio State, game 1: can the Hoosiers stop the talented Buckeyes?

Ohio State Buckeyes
Current record: 18-6 (8-3)
Current RPI:40
Current Sagarin:19
Current Pomeroy:14
2008-09 record: 22-11 (10-8), lost to Siena in first round of NCAA Tournament
2008-09 RPI: 32
2008-09 Sagarin: 28
2008-09 Pomeroy:37
Series: IU leads 101-74
Last Ohio State win:1/6/2010 (79-54 in Columbus)
Last IU win: 2/26/2008 (72-69 in Bloomington)
Last OSU win in Bloomington: 1/31/09 (93-81)
TV: 6:30, Big Ten Network

Blogs: Buckeye Battle Cry, Eleven Warriors


Just a week ago, Michigan State looked likely to run away with the Big Ten, but suddenly a five team race seems likely, and Ohio State, at 8-3, is in the hunt, in a four way tie (in the loss column) with MSU, Purdue, and, amazingly, Illinois.  Evan Turner missed several games with a back injury, but returned against IU and not long after led the Buckeyes to an impressive comeback win at Purdue.  IU's trip to Columbus was one of the ugliest moments of the Big Ten season and was IU's first true road game of the year.  While Ohio State is more of an offensive-oriented team, the Buckeye defense, combined with Hoosier ineptitude, led to a 79-54 blowout loss for IU

The Buckeyes are riding a seven-game Big Ten winning streak (their only loss in the last month was in a nonconference game at West Virginia) and haven't come close to losing to a sub-100 team such as IU.  Ohio State's losses are to North Carolina, @ Butler, @ Wisconsin, @ Michigan, @ Minnesota, and @ West Virginia.  The only disappointing loss on that list was the game at Michigan, and that loss came before Evan Turner returned to the lineup.  Ohio State has only two road wins, but one of those was the amazing comeback at Purdue.  IU, on the other hand, has played reasonably well at home in Big Ten play, with wins over Michigan and Minnesota and competitive losses to Illinois and Purdue, although IU was blown out by Iowa in what should have been the most winnable game of the bunch.

Simply, the Buckeyes are an astoundingly good offensive team.  They rank #9 in the nation in points per possession and #3 in the nation in effective field goal percentage.  They make 57 percent of their two point shots, 38 percent of their three point shots, turn the ball over only 17 percent of the time (#37 nationally).  They don't crash the offensive boards, but why would they bother?  On defense, OSU forces turnovers on 23 percent of possessions, plays excellent interior defense, and crashes the boards.  The Buckeyes do allow their opponents to make 35 percent of their three point shots, so perhaps IU streaky shooters will have a chance.  Here are OSU's stats:

FG 3PT FT Rebounds Misc
G M M A Pct M A Pct M A Pct Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF PPG
Evan Turner 18 33.6 7.8 13.9 56.0 0.4 1.6 25.0 3.7 5.1 72.8 2.4 7.0 9.4 5.7 3.7 2.1 0.8 2.6 19.7
William Buford 24 32.3 5.2 12.1 42.6 1.3 3.6 35.6 2.3 3.0 78.9 1.3 3.9 5.2 3.3 1.8 1.0 0.2 1.9 14.0
Jon Diebler 24 36.0 3.8 8.7 44.2 2.9 6.7 43.5 2.3 2.6 87.1 0.3 2.7 3.0 1.7 1.2 1.2 0.1 1.8 12.8
David Lighty 24 35.2 4.5 9.0 49.8 1.2 3.3 37.2 2.6 4.2 61.4 1.5 3.2 4.7 2.7 2.7 1.7 0.5 2.3 12.7
Dallas Lauderdale 23 24.6 2.9 3.7 76.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 3.0 45.6 1.7 3.3 5.0 0.3 0.9 0.7 2.4 2.2 7.1
Walter Offutt 2 11.0 2.0 4.5 44.4 1.0 2.5 40.0 2.0 3.0 66.7 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 7.0
Jeremie Simmons 23 14.3 2.0 4.2 46.4 1.1 2.7 39.7 0.9 1.2 75.0 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.2 5.9
P.J. Hill 20 15.5 1.2 2.6 44.2 0.7 1.7 39.4 1.0 1.2 83.3 0.3 1.3 1.6 1.6 0.8 0.5 0.0 1.5 4.0
Nikola Kecman 11 5.8 1.0 2.1 47.8 0.2 1.1 16.7 0.3 0.5 60.0 0.3 1.0 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.2 2.5
Kyle Madsen 24 12.8 1.1 1.9 57.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 57.1 0.8 1.1 1.8 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.7 2.3
Zisis Sarikopoulos 10 7.8 0.6 1.1 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 20.0 0.9 1.1 2.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 1.4 1.3
Mark Titus 7 2.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 50.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Danny Peters 7 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0
Eddie Days 3 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0


Look at the efficiency of those top scorers: Turner averages 19.7 points on 13.8 shots; Diebler averages 12.8 on 8.7 shots; Buford averages 14 on 12; Lighty 12.7 on 9.  This is very good for a team that doesn't get to the line all that much.  As IU's stats show, none of the active Hoosiers have anything approaching Turner's points-per-shot ratio (and yes, I wish we could delete Maurice Creek's stats from this list, beautiful as they are).


FG 3PT FT Rebounds Misc
G M M A Pct M A Pct M A Pct Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF PPG
Maurice Creek 12 25.4 5.8 10.9 52.7 2.5 5.6 44.8 2.4 3.2 76.3 1.6 2.3 3.8 1.8 1.5 1.4 0.4 1.8 16.4
Verdell Jones III 22 30.2 5.0 12.3 40.4 0.7 2.6 26.3 4.3 6.0 72.0 0.9 3.1 4.0 3.3 2.6 1.0 0.5 1.5 14.9
Christian Watford 22 27.3 4.1 10.3 40.1 0.5 1.4 32.3 3.7 4.5 81.0 2.0 3.8 5.8 0.7 2.4 0.6 0.6 2.3 12.4
Devan Dumes 22 17.7 2.1 6.1 34.1 1.2 3.7 32.9 1.5 2.0 74.4 0.5 1.7 2.2 1.1 1.7 1.0 0.1 1.9 6.9
Jeremiah Rivers 22 29.3 2.2 5.8 38.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.9 3.5 53.8 0.8 4.1 5.0 4.0 2.9 1.5 0.8 2.9 6.4
Jordan Hulls 22 22.6 1.7 4.4 38.5 1.3 3.5 36.8 1.0 1.3 78.6 0.8 1.3 2.1 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.0 1.8 5.6
Derek Elston 22 15.0 2.1 4.7 45.6 0.3 0.8 41.2 0.8 1.5 56.3 1.6 2.3 3.9 0.4 1.1 0.8 0.4 1.9 5.4
Tom Pritchard 22 21.4 2.0 3.2 63.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.8 46.2 1.8 2.2 4.0 0.5 1.1 0.5 0.6 3.4 4.9
Matt Roth 2 5.5 0.5 1.0 50.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 1.0 100.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.0
Bobby Capobianco 22 10.6 0.8 2.0 40.9 0.1 0.3 28.6 0.2 0.7 33.3 1.2 1.0 2.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 2.1 2.0
Daniel Moore 19 6.4 0.3 0.5 66.7 0.1 0.2 50.0 0.6 0.7 84.6 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.0 1.3
Tijan Jobe 15 5.3 0.3 0.4 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.1 0.5
Bawa Muniru 14 3.3 0.1 0.4 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 33.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.4
Brett Finkelmeier 7 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kory Barnett 7 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Steven Gambles 7 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0


The Buckeyes present some concerns.  IU is one of the worst teams in the nation in terms of having its shots blocked, and Dallas Lauderdale lives for blocking shots.  IU, while improved from last year, still turns the ball over too much.  Still, that is improving.  IU has turned the ball over on 20 percent or more of possessions in 19 of 32 games this season, but only once in the last five games and only 4 times in 10 Big Ten games.  Purdue, which forces turnovers even more successfully than OSU, didn't have much success in that regard against IU.

The Hoosiers have a chance, supposedly the 4th-best remaining chance for a win.  But the effort will have to far exceed the performance at Northwestern.
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join The Crimson Quarry

You must be a member of The Crimson Quarry to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Crimson Quarry. You should read them.

Join The Crimson Quarry

You must be a member of The Crimson Quarry to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Crimson Quarry. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker