Andre Kates and the perils of technology.
This is the second in a series of sponsored posts. The content of these posts has not been dictated to us, other than that they must bear some relationship to technology. Unfortunately, last week's developments in the IU football program provided an obvious topic for this post.
The widespread popularity of the Internet in general, and social media in particular, have changed the way fans follow sports and the way fans and players interact. Certainly, in the 1990s and early 2000s, the advent of message boards and blogs changed the way fans follow their teams, and allowed fans from all over the world to interact and discuss their favorite teams. In the last few years, Facebook and Twitter have exploded in popularity, and it's not uncommon for fans to become "Facebook friends" with players, and certainly to follow them on Twitter. That has blown up in the face of IU defensive back Andre Kates. Kates is a highly regarded junior college transfer who was expected to start at cornerback for IU,but has played sparingly. In the days leading up to the Northwestern game, Kates tweeted complaints about his playing time and criticism specifically directed at head coach Bill Lynch. Kates, finally exercising some discretion, now has protected his Twitter page, but he accused the coaching staff of "_______ with his career" and following up with "People Say Dre You Actin Like OchoCinco I Say No Bro Im Getting My Point Across That My Coach Don't Want Me 2 Play." It seems fitting, then, that IU fans learned of Kates's suspension for the Northwestern game not from the traditional media, but from Kates himself: "I'm Suspended For The Game 2morrow For My Tweets, and Facebook Being Media Attention, and Also A Distraction Toward Him!" Kates, according to Adam Rittenberg, continued to tweet during the Northwestern game, although in a positive fashion. Kates now is suspended indefinitely, and it appears likely that his IU career is over.
The question that the Kates saga raises is, how different is what Kates said from what any disgruntled player might have said 10, 20, or 50 years ago? The current generation of players certainly isn't the first to complain about playing time. The major difference is the medium. Before, players would go back to their dorm rooms and complain about the coach, or call a friend on the phone. Now, given the way people use social media, it's nearly inevitable that such comments will find their way back to the coach. I certainly don't mean to absolve Kates. The "OchoCinco" post quoted above makes clear that Kates's friends were telling him to shut up, and he was brazenly ignoring that advice. I'm no luddite. Overall, the Internet had enhanced my experience as a sports fan and that of millions of others. Still, connectivity has its costs. Today, Andre Kates is off the team, and his career in FBS football likely is over. The main reason for this is Kates's own lack of judgment. Still, if the medium by which his transmitted his dissatisfaction didn't exist, if he had simply been complaining to his friends and family, it's likely that he still would be on the IU football team. Hopfeully it will be a lesson to Kates, his teammates, and his classmates.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Indiana University:
Where Amazing (Athletes Finding New Ways To Let Their Potential Go To Waste To The Detriment of Themselves and Their Team) Happens
by LoneStarHoosier on Nov 5, 2010 11:51 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Not really what the story is about
but when I think about the whole Andre Kates situation I cannot help but think about Jerimy Finch. In both cases the consensus seemed to be that they were immensely talented, and that they should become immediate starters upon their arrival in Bloomington. However, for some reason both barely saw the field.
The point of my post is not to bash Lynch, although my support of him as the IU football coach could be characterized as lukewarm at best. Maybe these two were just enormous headcases who were uncoachable, but it just seems odd that Lynch was unwilling to play what may have been the two most talented defensive backfield players he’s ever brought to Bloomington. Especially given the swiss cheese nature of our defense during his tenure.
I think of the same thing with Matt LoVecchio and another hyped defensive transfer from the
DiNardo era. Maybe this sort of thing happens frequently at other schools, but it stands out more because hyped guys so rarely commit in any case, and those failures stick out like a sore thumb.
by LoneStarHoosier on Nov 6, 2010 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, it’s hard to know whether these two guys constitute a trend or just bad luck. As I’ve said before and as LoneStar notes below, there are plenty of 4 and 5 star recruits who fail at schools such as OSU, Alabama, Florida, etc., but are forgotten because they are replaced by other 4 and 5 star recruits. When those kids come to IU, we presume they are slam dunks, but some are just overrated. On the other hand, unless they are completely insubordinate, it does seem strange that those guys weren’t allowed to play much.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Nov 8, 2010 7:06 AM EST up reply actions

by 











