Northwestern 20, Indiana 17: stagnant Hoosiers offense rallies too late.
This game felt lost in the first quarter.
The IU defense, matching its strong start at Illinois last week, forced the Wildcat defense to punt on its first three possessions, but the Hoosiers managed only three points themselves during that stretch. The game wasn't really over at that point--IU briefly took the lead just before halftime (although a late NU drive gave the Wildcats a game-tying field goal at the gun) and pulled to within 3 in the final minute of the game, but ultimately, that failure to capitalize on NU's early struggles was ominous, and ultimately may well have cost IU the game. Chappell went through a horrible 1-10 streak early in the game, and while he rebounded, Chappell's stock has plunged since the Michigan game.
Of all of the disappointments in this game, the performance of the offense throughout was disappointing. On its first drive, the offense again bogged down in the red zone. IU missed a makeable field goal and, when the Hoosiers pulled within 3 points with less than a minute remaining, the execution on the onside kick was atrocious. The kick went less than ten yards before bouncing out of bounds and ensured the Northwestern victory.
That's not to excuse the defense, of course. When they were able to put NU in third and long on what eventually ended up as scoring drives, they allowed NU to capitalize. Once, IU blitzed. Once, the didn't. It didn't matter. Even a green quarterback coming off the bench for a third down play (in place of injured Dan Persa) was too much for the IU defense in crunch time. Still, the defense allowed 20 points, 380 yards, and 5.3 yards per play. That should have been good enough, at home, considering IU's defense.
Chappell has struggled under pressure in the last couple of weeks, and perhaps the expectations thrust on him because of his early season performances were unfair. He is an experienced, competent quarterback who put up incredible numbers against MAC, Sun Belt, I-AA, and Michigan-level defenses, but against any competent Big Ten competition, he has looked entirely average. Perhaps that's what he is. There's nothing wrong with it. But the early season expectations that we would see a special season from Chappell seem to be gone.
Individual notes:
- Damarlo Belcher continued his excellent junior season with 11 catches for 87 yards. He now leads the team with 58 receptions.
- Trea Burgess was decent, running 8 times for 37 yards, but IU never really managed to establish the run.
- Ted Bolser didn't catch a touchdown, but did manage four receptions.
- Darius Johnson had 11 tackles and a sack. He is emerging as one of the few bright spots on defense.
- Walk-on Greg Heban, starting his first game, broke up three passes. Matt Ernest broke up two.
Before the season, my basic assessment was that 7 or more wins would be good, 5 or fewer wins would be bad, and 6 would be a mixed bag--improvement and likely a bowl bid, but not significant progress considering the schedule. Now, 6 wins has become the best case scenario, and it is very unlikely. Iowa, IU's Senior Day opponent for next week, brutalized previously undefeated Michigan State yesterday. IU has defeated Wisconsin only twice in the last 17 years. Penn State isn't very good but has shown that it can score points against bad defenses. Purdue is horrible, but I'm not sure it matters, given the way IU has played at Ross-Ade from 1998 to present. In short, even finding a way to 6-6, for the honor of playing a MAC team in Detroit, requires a miracle. That's the state of our program on the last day of October. What a disappointment.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Despite mountains of evidence to the contrary,
I maintained hope prior to this game. Of course, I eschewed rational thinking in favor of the unlikely circumstance that while we’ve been entirely ordinary against good teams/defenses, the Illinois debacle wasn’t a true sign of where this team stands. The belief that returning to the comforts of home to catch a beatable NW team coming off a huge near-miss against MSU last week further fueled my positive thinking. As an Indiana fan that has always come to expect the absolute worst (is there any other kind?), I was remarkably out of character. Sure enough, the offense looked just as sluggish as in Champaign, and no longer is there any doubt that our early gaudy numbers are an excruciating, bowl berth-snatching mirage. Had you told me at 11:45 am that NW would only have 20 points at game’s end I would have all but guaranteed victory. Now, our season is effectively over barring, as you’ve rightfully explained, a miracle. I can’t even enjoy Purdue’s miserable team and successive beatings each week because I know no matter how terrible their team, they will assuredly give us a game, and a loss to an atrocious Purdue team to cap a season that, overstated or not, began with such promise is unbearable. Ugh. What a shame.
Oh yeah, Purdue will give us a game. I think there is less than a 50 percent chance that we will give them a game.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Nov 1, 2010 7:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Chappell is not the answer.....
The defense was not great but they held NU scoreless in the 1st quarter. This “high powere” offense put up 3 points, by the way please stop the Chappell sneak on third down. Special teams as normal was awful. But this team, I’m not sure frustrating is the word. Pretenders comes to mind in terms of the offense. Why did they not target Bolser more in the red zone???? The guy is a td machine.
I will say that the only chance IU has of ever going bowling again will be when they have a mobile QB that can overcome the poor o-line that IU puts out there year after year. And no Chappell is not a mobile QB and he should not be running the pistol. Thats like Mallett still being at Michigan and running the spread. But oh well, ill be there next week against Iowa, maybe Iowa forgets to get off the bus.
Running with a QB like Chappell is hard to defend when it doesn’t work. The only way a designed run makes sense with him is a) a third or fourth and inches scenario; or b) a flaw or hole in the defense that is such that the run can’t fail. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Nov 1, 2010 7:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Someone who knows more than I needs to explain this
But I understand that the pistol offense is designed primarily as a run offense, in that is supposedly opens up a lot of options on a given play. If you cannot run — and, specifically, if you have an immobile quarterback — your options are severely limited. I saw none of the Illinois game. Based on what I saw on Saturday, it looked like Northwestern had all of the plays read very well, and there was little that IU could or did do to adjust.
So are we better off at this point of this season putting a guy like Dusty Kiel back there who is, by all accounts, much more mobile? I am not even thinking of the seasoning he’ll get for the future. I am just questioning whether that’s best for this season. Chappell supposedly has a better arm, but he was not at all accurate on Saturday.
by hoosierdaddynow on Nov 1, 2010 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know. The bloom is off the Chappell rose right now, and you may be right about the suitability of the offense. As bad as Ben looked at times on Saturday, I tend to think that an experienced senior who isn’t terribly well-suited for the offense might be better than a raw redshirt freshman who has never played an entire game, even if the latter is better-suited to the offense. Of course, it’s all academic. A radical move like that simply isn’t within Lynch’s personality. They’ll either figure it out with Ben or they won’t.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Nov 1, 2010 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions

by 











