Loyola Md. Greyhounds 72, Indiana Hoosiers 67: awful first half dooms IU.
Here are the stats. Stats are of limited use in games like this, where one team dominates one half and the other team dominated the other. On paper, this looks like an even game, but essentially was dominated by one team or the other for the duration.
The first few minutes of the first half were the worst I have seen IU play against any opponent ever. If I am forgetting another horrific start like that, even against a great team, please remind me. IU did not score until the 13:43 mark, when it was already 15-0. With 10:30 remaining, they trailed 24-4. From that point forward, the offense improved, and IU played relatively even with Loyola for the rest of the game, but gave up 22 points in the second half of the first half. At halftime, IU had 8 field goals, 6 offensive rebounds in 18 opportunities, and 14 turnovers. I wouldn't have like it, but could have accepted it, if this had happened against Kentucky. Against Loyola? I really don't know what to say.
Certainly, the Hoosiers can take some pride in the comeback and their unwillingness to give up, but I can't take much solace in a comeback that never should have been required in the first place. IU is an immature team, and despite Tom Crean's warnings about what could happen, it happened. After IU did take the lead at 65-62, after a punishing press forced Loyola into 15 second half turnovers, the Hoosiers scored only two more points, and missed 4 free throws and 2 shots in the final 2:55. Loyola deserves much credit for hanging on.
Jeremiah Rivers played well for most of the game, but overshadowed his career-high 15 points by missing four free throws in the final three minutes. Maurice Creek spent part of the first half in the defensive doghouse and scored only 9 points and committed 4 turnovers. Christian Watford struggled again, with 3-11 from the field and 5 turnovers.
This game settles one thing: we can stop thinking about postseason play. Even if IU beats Bryant, the Hoosiers would have to go 10-8 in the Big Ten to be assured of a winning record, and absent a miraculous turnaround, that isn't going to happen. This remains a young team, with only 6 seasons of previous D-I experience on the roster. Unfortunately, that youth has cost IU three winnable games this season, and we can only hope that the experience changes things next year.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wait, wait, wait
We hit rock bottom last year. Right? Right!?
by hoosierdaddynow on Dec 23, 2009 7:28 AM EST reply actions
Well, I think we did. I have a feeling there will be some moments during Big Ten play that will make us wonder, “how did this team spot a 24 point lead to Loyola?!” We’re better, we’re going to be better than 1-17 in the Big Ten, but it’s not going to be a straight path out of this mess.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Dec 23, 2009 8:19 AM EST reply actions
Thank you.
That ledge was looking scary. I am counting on you to slap me around for the balance of the season, when we (inevitably) have moments like this.
by hoosierdaddynow on Dec 23, 2009 8:48 AM EST up reply actions
I can make no promises. I’m going to have a big old temper tantrum if we don’t beat Michigan next Thursday to avenge the game we gave away last year.
The Crimson Quarry, SB Nation's Indiana Hoosiers blog
by John M (The Crimson Quarry) on Dec 23, 2009 9:24 AM EST up reply actions
We better beat Michigan....
I’m so tired of the losing. Especially to these teams from conferences that no one has ever heard of. Why don’t we schedule IPFW at least we’d lose to a former IU player that way. I hope they wake up and realize you have to fight and scrap for 40 min.
Price Check on aisle BOOM.
by Ditkavsworld on Dec 23, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions

by 











