Here's the box
lost by 16, but was within 9 points with under four minutes remaining, so obviously on a superficial level, IU
exceeded expectations. I would love to claim this game as significant progress, but I think it had more to do with an uncharacteristically awful shooting performance by Gonzaga
. The Zags
shot 45 percent from the field but only 3-16 from behind the arc. Unfortunately, IU's
shooting was even worse, 30 percent for the game, although the Hoosiers stayed in it by shooting 6-12 from behind the arc in the second half. If there was any bright spot for the Hoosiers, that was it: maximizing possessions by taking care of the ball and making three pointers is IU's
only hope for respectability. Unfortunately, the second part of that equation, taking care of the ball, was as bad as ever. IU
turned the ball over 25 times in a 69 possession game. That 34 percent turnover percentage is IU's
worst of the season, which is saying something. Verdell
Jones missed his second consecutive game after an apparent concussion in the Cornell game, and could have been used to spell Daniel Moore, who turned the ball over 7 times in 37 minutes of play. Tom Pritchard
played well, although he spent most of the game in foul trouble. Malik
Story emerged, scoring 14 points on 11 shots, but there weren't too many offensive success stories for the Hoosiers.
IU enters an interesting stretch of the schedule. The Hoosiers play TCU at home on Wednesday before playing a spotty Kentucky team on the road. I don't expect a win at UK, but a competitive game might be a positive sign, while a loss to TCU probably spells disaster.