Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

The Georgia Tech game: Big Ten/ACC Challenge.

Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
Overall record: 3-2
ACC record: 0-0
2006-07 record: 20-12 (lost to UNLV in first round of NCAA Tournament)
2006-07 RPI: 52
2006-07 Sagarin: 30
Series: IU leads 1-0 (87-65 in Los Angeles, 12/29/69)
TV: 7 pm tonight, ESPN
If you, like me, couldn't recall IU ever playing Georgia Tech, if you are under the age of 40, your memory did not fail you. IU and GT have played only once, 38 years ago, on a neutral court in Los Angeles (presumably some sort of holiday tournament). So, in the spirit of inter-regional competition, the BT/ACC Challenge is providing an unusual matchup tonight. This is IU's seventh appearance in the BT/ACC. Bob Knight did not favor this made-for-TV event, so 2001-02, Mike Davis's second year, was IU's first appearance in the challenge. This is also, from a preseason perspective, IU's least formidable Challenge opponent. In 2001, IU played and beat an ultimately awful UNC team (at the Dean Dome) that was supposed to be good. In 2002, IU defeated Maryland at Conseco Fieldhouse in a rematch of the NCAA championship game. Since then, IU has lost four in a row: badly at Wake Forest in 2003, at home to Sean May and eventual NCAA champion North Carolina in 2004, at home to Josh McRoberts and Duke in 2005, and a close one against Duke at Cameron in 2006.
In other words, despite not having many good teams during this time period, IU has always faced a formidable Challenge opponent. Now that IU is highly ranked in the preseason for the first time in eons, we are given a home game against a should-win opponent. Go figure.
I'm running out of time and won't get much of a look at GT's personnel, but here's a quick look at the tempo free numbers:
Pace: 73.4 possessions per game (#64 nationally; IU is #59 at 73.6);
Offensive efficiency: 1.08 points per possession (#79 nationally; IU is #19 at 1.16)
Defensive officiency: 1.07 points per possession (#251 nationally; IU is #68 at .913)
Offensive rebounding: 38 percent of OR opportunities (#76 nationally; IU is #185 at 33.1)
Defensive rebounding: 34.7 percent OR allowed (#204 nationally; IU is #152 at 32.6).
GT doesn't appear to bring much to the table defensively, and has a couple of tough losses to UNC-Greensboro and Winthrop. On the other hand, GT has defeated Notre Dame and Charlotte (in addition to Tennessee State), so the Jackets have performed better against legitimate competition than IU has.


Comment 0 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome. I previously blogged about IU at The Hoosier Report for about two years. You can follow The Crimson Quarry on Twitter. E-mail me at crimsonquarry at sbcglobal.net.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Hepsrevenge_medium_small
The More You Know: Purdue and North Korea
Small
Rivalry Time. Thoughts from a Purdue fan.
Preston____small
Big Ten Midseason Awards
Small
New offensive coordinator
Small
New Uni's??
Crean-1_small
2014 Top 10 Recruit Jaquan Lyle
Small
An Open Letter to Santa
Indws76080l_small
Have you seen this?
386613_712697776352_57107913_34751907_919238337_n_small
Visiting UK fan story on KSR.com
Indws76080l_small
Watched from Afghanistan

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Crimson-lg_small John M (The Crimson Quarry)

Editors

Small Devin S.

Crean-1_small JustAJ